What is the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour, geared towards explaining the behavioural characteristics of phobias
Mowrer (1960) proposed the two-process model - stating that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning
How are phobias acquired through classical conditioning?
We learn to associate something of which we have no fear of (neutral stimulus) with something that already triggers a fear response (unconditioned stimulus)
Watson and Rayner (1920) exposed a 9 month old baby called 'Little Albert' to a rat which he previously showed no anxiety to - but whenever the rat was present, researchers made a loudfrighteningnoise near Albert's ear
Rat (neutral stimulus) became associated with the noise (unconditioned stimulus), both becoming conditioned to produce fear and this distress was generalised to similar objects like fur coats
How are phobias maintained through operant conditioning?
Phobias are often long-lasting because our behaviour is reinforced (rewarded) increasing its' frequency
Mowrer suggests this happens specifically through negative reinforcement -whenever we avoid a phobic stimulus we successfullyescape a fearful and anxiety-provoking situation
Reduction in fear reinforces the avoidant behaviour and so the phobia is maintained
What is one strength of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Real-world application: has led to the development of exposure therapies such as systematic desensitisation
Idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance is important in explaining why phobics benefit from being exposed to it - once avoidant behaviour is prevented it cannot be reinforced and so the phobia is cured
Shows the value of the two-process model by identifying a means of treating phobias
What is another strength of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Research support: Jongh et al. (2006) found that 73% of people with a fear of dental treatment had previously experienced a traumatic event mostly involvingdentistry compared to a control group of 21%
Confirms association between stimulus (dentistry) and an unconditioned response (pain) leads to the development of phobias
HOWEVER not all phobias follow a bad experience - some people have phobias of snakes but live in populations where experiences with snakes are rare - shows association is not strong
What is one limitation of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Incomplete explanation: doesn't account for the cognitive aspects of phobias
Explains key behavioural aspects such as avoidance yet doesn't explain cognitive components such as irrational beliefs regarding the phobic stimulus, offering adequate answers for everything butphobic cognitions
Two-process model doesn't explain all symptoms of phobias, making it a limited explanation
What is another limitation of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Evolutionary theory: behavioural models provide credible individual explanations for particular people and specific phobias
Seligman (1971) argued that all animals are genetically programmed to rapidly learn an association between fear and potentiallylife-threatening stimuli due to an increased risk in our ancestry
'Ancient fears' - things that would have been dangerous in our evolutionary past like snakes
Explains phobic acquisition as just an adaptation to these ancient fears, providing a different explanation that the two-process model does not account for