Bandura A03

Cards (66)

  • How large was the sample size in Bandura's 1961 study?
    72
  • How large was the sample size in Bandura's 1963 study?
    96
  • How large was the sample size in Bandura's 1965 study?
    66
  • Why might large sample sizes cancel out anomalies in studies?
    Because unusual participants are balanced by typical ones
  • Why might children from a university nursery be unrepresentative of normal children?
    They might have unusual home lives
  • Why might it be difficult to generalize from children to adults in Bandura's studies?
    Adults might be less influenced by role models
  • What did the 1965 Bandura study show about learned behaviors?
    Children can learn behaviours but not act it out until later
  • According to the text, why might Bandura's studies not apply to adults?
    Adults might be less influenced by role models
  • How does Bandura's procedure enhance reliability?
    It can be replicated
  • What type of procedure did Bandura use?
    Standardised procedure
  • How did Bandura ensure inter-rater reliability in his studies?
    By using two observers behind the one-way mirror
  • What is meant by inter-rater reliability?
    A behaviour had to be noted by both observers
  • How did filming the 1963 study enhance its reliability?
    The films can be watched by anyone
  • What application does the 1961 Bandura study have?
    Parenting and teaching styles
  • What does the 1961 Bandura study suggest about parenting and teaching?
    Children observe and imitate adults
  • What possible effect could calm role models have on troubled students?
    They might help troubled students learn
  • To what does the 1963a Bandura study have application?
    TV censorship
  • According to Bandura, what effect might cartoon violence have on children?
    It might be causing aggressive behaviour
  • What argument does the 1963 study count against?
    The "catharsis" argument
  • What is the "catharsis" argument often used to defend?
    Violent sports
  • What does the "catharsis" argument claim about watching violent sports?
    It helps audiences "vent" their aggression harmlessly
  • What does Bandura suggest should happen to violent sports shown to children?
    They should not be shown to children
  • How do heroes in media often reinforce violent behaviour?
    By being rewarded for violence
  • How is violence rewarded in video games?
    By "levelling up"
  • How is violence rewarded in films?
    The violent hero saves the day
  • What does the 1965 Bandura study apply to?
    Media censorship
  • What might reduce violence in society, according to the text?
    More media censorship
  • What alternative media strategy is suggested to reduce violence?
    Showing real consequences of violence
  • What is the main criticism of Bandura's studies?
    They lack validity
  • What kind of situation did Bandura's studies create for children?
    A strange situation
  • What is a Bobo Doll designed to do?
    Be hit and knocked over
  • What might children suppose experimenters wanted them to do with the Bobo Doll?
    Play with it in this way
  • What are demand characteristics?
    Participants do what they think researchers demand
  • How did Bandura address the issue of demand characteristics?
    Creating a film with an adult attacking a clown
  • What did children use to aggress against the "real life clown"?
    Plastic mallets
  • According to the text, why is the "real life clown" variation appropriate for students to use in the exam?
    It's well-attested in textbooks
  • What other explanations for aggression are there, besides role models?
    Biological ones
  • What did Raine et al.'s 1997 study link to aggression?
    Certain brain deficits
  • Why could the children not give valid consent?
    Because of their age
  • Which brain area is linked to aggression, according to Raine et al.?
    Weak prefrontal cortex