Jenness (1932) – one of the first psychologists to study conformity.
Jenness used an ambiguous situation involving a glass bottle filled with jelly beans and had participants:
Give an individual estimate
Give a group estimate
Give a final individual estimate
They found when in a social group, most pps would change their answers to fit in with the group answer
Asch -
Aim:
To assess what extent people will conform in unambiguous situations
Procedure:
123 American male pps
Pps were asked to match a standard line with 3 comparison lines with a clear correct answer
Pps were in groups of 6-8 confederates who gave scripted incorrect answers
Assessed the frequency of the pp conforming to the group
Findings
The pps conformed 36.8% of the time
75% of pps conformed at least once
Most pps conformed to avoid rejection (Normative SI)
Conclusions
People conform even in unambiguous situations
In unambiguous situations, people conform to NSI
Asch variations -
The following aspects were changed and their effects on conformity measured:
Group size
Unanimity (level of agreement)
Task difficulty
Asch variations - group size
Varied the number of confederates from 1 to 15.
Found conformity increased with group size but only up to a point; With 3 confederates conformity was at 31.8% but the presence of more confederates made little difference
Suggests:
Most people are very sensitive to the views of others as just 1 / 2 confederates is enough to sway opinion
Asch variations - unanimity
One confederate disagreed with the group (either gave the correct answer or a different wrong answer)
Found conformity dropped in the presence of a dissenter
Suggests:
Influence of the majority depends on it being unanimous
Asch variation - task difficulty
Made the task harder by making the comparison lines more similar in length (making the task more ambiguous)
Found conformity increased as pp’s looked to others for guidance
Suggests:
When in an ambiguous situation, conformity is more likely due to Informational social influence