psychologists generate a theory and test it to see if it’s right (deductive reasoning) or generate a theory once they have an answer (inductive reasoning)
falsifiability
just one piece of falsification evidence isn’t enough to suggest that a theory isn’t true
replicability
repeating a study to ensure generalisability of findings
features of experiments to suggest psychology research is replicable
standardised methods
standardised procedure
controlled conditions
behaviour categories
operationalised variables
objectivity
personal opinions and desires shouldn’t affect the research - they need directempirical evidence to support something
techniques used in psychology to increase objectivity
controls
doubleblind collection of data
operationalised variables
peer review
standardised procedures
Why do some people think psychology is less objective than other sciences?
Studying personal experience requires a certain level of subjectivity
paradigm
general theories that encompass many smaller theories
paradigmshift
assumptions and terminology change but the shifts are generally accepted beliefs by the majority of the community
according to Kuhn, a science should have a shared set of:
assumptions, scientific methods and terminology
psychology supported as having a paradigm
there is agreement on what the subject is and most modern psychologists use scientific methods
psychology refuted as having a paradigm
there are a number of different approaches in psychology with different views about why we think and feel the way we d