occupiers liability

Cards (122)

  • According to s1(2) of OLA 1957, who is considered an occupier?

    Someone in occupational control of the premises
  • Which case helps define who an occupier is under the OLA 1957?

    Wheat v E Lacon
  • According to Lord Denning, what are the four categories of occupier?

    • Tenant
    • Licensee
    • Part of building (landlord retains control of some parts)
    • Independent contractor
  • If a landlord cannot enter a tenant's premises without providing notice, what is the typical notice period?

    24 hour notice
  • According to s1(3)(a) of the OLA 1957, what constitutes a "premises"?

    A fixed or moveable structure
  • What kind of permission does a postman typically have to enter a premises?

    Implied permission
  • According to S2(1) of the OLA 1957, what kind of duty do occupiers owe to visitors?

    A common duty of care
  • According to S2(2) of the OLA 1957, what level of care must an occupier take to ensure visitor safety?

    Reasonable care to be reasonably safe
  • According to S2(3)(a) of OLA 1957, what should an occupier consider regarding children visiting their premises?

    Children are less careful than adults
  • Which case demonstrates that allurements will not work in favour of a defendant?

    Glasgow v Taylor
  • In Phipps v Rochester, why was the defendant not held liable when a child fell into a trench?

    Parents should have supervised the child
  • In which case was an occupier liable for children playing on a dangerous abandoned boat?

    Jolley v Sutton
  • According to S2(3)(b), what expectation is there regarding tradespeople on a premises?

    Tradespeople must be careful themselves as trades come with their own risks
  • In Roles v Nathan, why was the occupier not liable for the chimney sweeps' deaths?

    Chimney sweeps should know the risks
  • Under S2(4), what three requirements must be met for an occupier to potentially pass liability to an independent contractor?

    • Reasonable to give work to IC
    • Contractor must be competent
    • Occupier must check work was done properly
  • Which case demonstrates the requirement that it's reasonable for the occupier to give work to an IC?

    Haseldine v Daw & Don
  • Which case demonstrates the requirement that a contractor must be competent?

    Bottomley v Todmorden Cricket Club
  • Which case demonstrates the requirement that the occupier must check work was done properly?

    Woodward v Mayor of Hastings
  • Under S2(4)(a), do warnings automatically remove liability, especially with children?

    No, they don't automatically remove liability
  • When is a warning sufficient to remove liability?

    If sufficient for the situation or obvious
  • In Rae v Mars, why was the warning considered insufficient?

    It was inside the entrance to a dark pit
  • In Staples v West Dorset City Council, why was the occupier not liable for the injury?

    The danger was obvious
  • According to S2(1), what can an occupier do regarding their duty of care?

    Extend, restrict, modify or exclude it
  • What is the meaning of "volenti non fit injuria" according to S2(5)?

    To a willing person, injury is not done
  • What does contributory negligence mean in the context of occupiers' liability?

    Claimant is partially responsible for injuries
  • Who carries the burden of proof in occupiers' liability cases?

    The claimant
  • What is the main difference between OLA 1957 and OLA 1984?

    Liability to visitors vs. trespassers
  • Which case led to the creation of OLA 1984?

    Herrington v British Railway Board
  • How is a trespasser defined in relation to a premises?

    Enters without permission or violates terms
  • According to S1(4) of OLA 1984, what duty of care is owed to trespassers?

    Reasonable care so trespasser isn't injured
  • According to S1(3) of OLA 1984, under what three conditions is a duty of care owed to a trespasser?

    • Occupier is aware of the danger
    • Occupier knows person is near the danger
    • Danger is significant, occupier should extend protection
  • Is there an automatic duty of care owed by occupiers to trespassers?

    No, there is no automatic duty
  • Compared to visitors, is the protection of trespassers higher or lower?

    Much lower
  • In Donoghue v Folkestone, what did the court decide about warning adult trespassers?

    No need to warn of obvious danger
  • In Ratcliff v Mcconnell, when does an occupier not have to warn adult trespassers against risks?

    Unforeseeable time of day/year
  • In Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council, when will an occupier not owe a duty of care to a trespasser?

    If he doesn't expect them to enter
  • In Higgs v Poster, when does an occupier not owe a duty of care?

    For a danger he's unaware of
  • What did Rhino v Astbury suggest about the judicial approach to children and adult trespassers?

    Appears to be the same
  • What test was used in Platt v Liverpool City Council to determine if the occupier breached their duty?

    Reasonable man test
  • According to S1(5) of OLA 1984, how can a duty be discharged?

    Reasonable steps to warn of danger