Academisation and Free schools are ideological with no evidence of improved standards
Free schools advantage the middle classes
Pupil Premium impact still uncertain
Tory Education Policy 2015-2019:
Continued marketisation and neoliberal agenda
Policies: austerity and funding cuts, conversion to academies, more grammar schools, Pupil Premium, EBacc, T Level Qualifications
Evaluations:
Fully blown education market may lack democratic oversight
Grammar schools increase advantage for middle classes
EBacc potentially narrows curriculum
T Levels increase choice and diversity
In response to the Covid-19 Pandemic:
Schools were locked down from mid-March to June 2020 and then from January to late March 2021
Home-based, online learning became the norm
GCSE and A-Level exams were cancelled in 2020 and again in 2021
Teachers awarded their own grades, with 45% of pupils receiving an A or A* grade in 2021 compared to 25% in 2019
The Catch Up Premium was introduced in 2021, providing £650 million directly to schools and £350 million for a national tutoring programme
Post-covid funding for schools is set to increase by 7% per pupil by 2024-25
Funding increases to education from 2023 do not cover the rising costs of living
Effects of Covid-19 on education:
Resulted in a 'covid education gap' with children falling behind in progress in maths and reading
Created a covid disadvantage gap, with poor pupils falling further behind wealthier pupils due to differences in home-support standards during lockdowns
Students from the least deprived schools did almost three hours more work per week during lockdown compared to students from the most deprived schools
Teacher Predicted Grades were generous, giving an unfair advantage to students receiving them compared to those sitting exams in 2023
Core Aims of The New Right in Education:
The New Right aimed to improve standards through marketisation
Marketisation involves making schools compete for pupils and government funding
Parentocracy gives parents the choice over which schools to send their children to
The 1988 Education Act introduced:
League tables
The national curriculum (including GCSEs)
Formula funding
Open enrolment (parental choice)
OFSTED inspections
League Tables:
Schools ranked based on exam performance
Published in newspapers and online
Intended to force schools to raise standards
The National Curriculum:
Required all schools to teach the same subjects from age 7-16
Introduced GCSEs and SATs
Aimed to make it easier for parents to compare and choose between schools
OFSTED:
Established in 1993 to inspect schools
Reports published and underperforming schools may be shut down
Aims to raise standards
Open Enrolment (parental choice):
Parents allowed to select multiple schools
Some schools became oversubscribed
Criteria for selecting pupils, including siblings at the school and proximity
Formula Funding:
Funding based on the number of pupils enrolled
Undersubscribed schools may decrease in size or close
Oversubscribed schools could expand
The declining power of Local Education Authorities:
Parents gained more power to choose schools
Heads of schools managed budgets
LEAs lost control over education management at the county level
Evidence that the 1988 Education Act worked:
Improved GCSE results over the last 30 years
No fundamental changes to the act by successive governments
Application of competition internationally through PISA league tables
Criticisms of the 1988 Education Act:
League Tables distort teaching and learning
Criticism that the curriculum in schools has become more narrow over the years
Schools increasingly 'teach to the test' to look good in league tables, potentially stifling children's ability to think critically and laterally
SATS harm children's mental health, causing stress and pressure to perform well
Rich Parents have more Choice of Schools due to higher incomes
Middle Classes have more effective choice due to their higher incomes
Cultural Capital gives the middle class more choice in school selection
The best schools cream skim, becoming more selective and preferring middle class pupils
Polarisation leads to an increase in Inequality of Education Opportunity, with the best schools getting better and the worst getting worse
New Labour's education policies aimed to raise standards and create a skilled labor force to compete in the global knowledge economy
New Labour wanted to achieve greater equality of opportunity by making education more inclusive and improving the experience of education for all
New Labour's education policies were influenced by both Neoliberalism and the New Right, as well as Social Democratic ideals
New Labour emphasized introducing free-market principles into education to make schools more competitive and give parents more choice
New Labour increased the role of the private sector in education through academies and Private Finance Initiatives
New Labour introduced vocational education policies to prepare children for the world of work
New Labour focused on improving equality of opportunity and tackling social disadvantage through state education
New Labour introduced policies to promote equality of educational opportunity, including Academies, Sure Start, Education Maintenance Allowance, and increased state expenditure on education
Under New Labour, there was a renewed emphasis on teaching essential skills such as literacy, numeracy, and I.T.
New Labour introduced citizenship classes to address social fragmentation
The national curriculum was made more flexible with added vocational elements
A Levels were modernized and made modular with the introduction of AS Levels