Identify differences in how males and females negotiate and how they are treated by others in negotiation
Summarize ways to overcome negotiation disadvantages resulting from genderdifferences and stereotypes
Examine specific personality traits influencing negotiation behaviors and processes
Explain how differences in various abilities affect negotiators
Recent studies are shedding light on genderdifferences in negotiation and why they can be hard to find in broad comparisons of male and femalenegotiators
Men and women conceive negotiations differently in terms of relationship versus task orientation, competition versus collaboration, perception of negotiation opportunities, and outcome expectations
Men and women communicate differently and are treated differently in negotiations
Exchange tactics and aggressive tactics have different effects when used by men versus women in negotiations
Gender stereotypes can affect negotiator performance, but these effects can be overcome through motivational and cognitive interventions
Social value orientation refers to preferences for outcomes in socialsettings, with pro-self or pro-social orientations
Self-efficacy, the judgment of one's ability to behave effectively, plays a crucial role in negotiation outcomes and goal-setting
Machiavellianism involves cynicism about others' motives and a tendency towards un-altruistic behavior and deception
Face threat sensitivity relates to the value individuals place on their public image and reputation, influencing their negotiation behavior
The "Big Five" personality traits include extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness, impacting negotiation outcomes
Approaches to studying personality in negotiation include conflict style, social value orientation, interpersonal trust, self- efficacy, self- monitoring, Machiavellianism, face threat sensitivity, and the "Big Five" personality traits
Conflict styles are categorized into competing, accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, and compromising styles based on assertiveness and cooperativeness levels
Interpersonal trust varies among individuals, influencing their negotiation behaviors
Self-monitoring reflects how responsive individuals are to social cues, affecting their behavioral choices
Implicit negotiation beliefs, whether negotiation skills are malleable or fixed, impact negotiation performance
Cognitive ability influences reasoning, decision-making, and adaptability in negotiation settings
Perspective-taking ability enables negotiators to anticipate others' behavior, leading to higher jointoutcomes
Behaviors of successful negotiators during pre-negotiation planning and face-to-face bargaining contribute to negotiation success
Gender, personality, and ability all play a role in negotiator behavior, but individuals can compensate for their differences by being aware of them
Negotiation in business involves planning and strategy
Goals are the focus that drives negotiation strategy
Goals in negotiation have direct and indirect effects on strategy
Direct effects of goals on strategy include:
Wants are not goals
Goals are often linked to the other party’s goals
Goals must be attainable
Effective goals must be concrete, specific, and measurable
Goals in negotiation can also be intangible or procedural
Indirect effects of goals on strategy include:
Forging an ongoing relationship
In negotiation planning, defining the issues and assembling them to create a bargaining mix is crucial
Interests in negotiation planning can be substantive, process-based, or relationship-based
In negotiation planning, defining limits, alternatives, targets, and openingbids is essential
Assessing constituents and the social context of the negotiation is part of the planning process
In negotiation planning, analyzing the other party's resources, interests, needs, and likely strategy is important
Defining the protocol for negotiation includes setting the agenda, location, length, and agreement tracking
Strategy in negotiation is the overallplan to accomplish goals, while tactics are short-termmoves to pursue strategies
Approaches to strategy can be unilateral or bilateral
The Dual Concerns Model categorizes negotiation strategies into avoidance, competition, collaboration, and accommodation
The choice of negotiation strategy depends on the concern for achieving desired outcomes and the quality of the relationship with the other party
Non-engagement strategy involves avoidance if needs can be met without negotiation
Active-engagement strategies in negotiation include competition, collaboration, and accommodation
Key points in negotiation planning involve understanding issues, interests, limits, alternatives, targets, and openings
Understanding constituents, the other party, planning the negotiation process, and defining protocol are crucial in negotiation planning