Models of memory

Cards (20)

  • Atkinson and shriffrin (1968) created the multistore model of memory
  • Atkinson and shriffrin (1968) multistore model of memory: stages
    1. Sensory register
    2. Short term memory
    3. Long term memory
  • Atkinson and shriffrin (1968) multistore model of memory: sensory register to short term memory
    The information we pay attention to in our senses goes into the short term memory
  • Atkinson and shriffrin (1968) multistore model of memory: short term to long term
    If short term information is rehearsed theoretically it can be held in the long term memory forever
  • Primacy effecton recall
    Ps can recall first few items on a list better than the middle ones.
    Multistore model says we rehearse the first items so they can go into the LTM.
    If rehearsal is prevented by interference, effect disappears
  • Recency effect recall
    Ps remember last few items on a list better than the middle.
    The last few items may still be in the STM when the experimenter asks the Ps to recall the items
  • Koraskoff syndrome effect on recall
    Able to recall last few items on a list hinting STM still works but LTM is poor supporting seperate sections in the model
  • Miller et al (1957) HM case study
    Frequent epilepsy and seizures.
    Doctor removed hippocampus
    Reduced epilepsy but suffered memory loss
    Form short term memory --> couldn't form new long term memory
    Supports types of memory are separate systems
  • Limitations of multistore model
    1. Info transferred from STM to LTM but people don't spend their time rehearsing yet info still goes to LTM. Some items can't be rehearsed
    2. Oversimplified, assumes only one long term store and one short term store. This has been disproved from evidence of brain damaged patients.
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) working memory model
    1 Central executive
    1.1 Phonological loop 1.2 Episodic buffer 1.3 Visuospatial sketchpad
    1.11 Phonological store 1.12 Articulatory
    2 Long term memory
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) Working memory model: central executive
    Attention of senses
    Limited capacity
    Control slave systems that also have a limited capacity
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) working memory model: Phonological loop
    • Holds speech based info
    • Phonological store (inner ear)
    • Articulatory process (inner voice that rehearses info by repeating it)
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) working memory model: visuo-spatial sketchpad
    Temporary storage of visual and spatial information
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) working memory model: Episodic buffer
    Briefly stores information from other sub-systems and integrates, along with info from LTM
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1974) working memory model: Interference task:
    • Ps perform 2 tasks simultaneously using the same system their performance is affected
    • Both tasks using phonological loop which has a limited capacity and can't cope with both tasks
    • If task involves 2 different systems performance isn't affected on either task
  • Strengths of working memory model - Gathercole and Baddeley (1993)
    • Ps split into 2 groups
    • Ps follow moving spotlight, use visuo-spatial sketchpad and at the same time one group describes angles on a letter (another task involving vss)
    • Other group of Ps use phonological loop do a verbal task following the light
    • Performance better when doing tasks that use separate systems
  • Strengths of working memory model - general
    • Less emphasis on rehearsal than MSM .
    • Working model looks at multiple processes for memory
    • Other processes at work for long term memory
  • Weaknesses of working memory model - Central executive
    • Idea of central executive is simplistic and vague
    • Doesn't explain what it is
    • Difficult to design tasks to test central executive
  • Weaknesses of working memory model - STM to LTM
    Only explains how info is delt with in the STM and doesn't explain how it transfers to the LTM
  • Weaknesses of working memory model - lab studies
    Lack ecological validity as the tests and results lack replicability and generalisability to a real world setting