ATTACHMENT TYPES + STRANGE SITUATION

    Cards (15)

    • The strange situation was a controlled observation to test attachment
    • PROXIMITY SEEKING - Good attachment means stay close to carer
    • EXPLORATION + SECURE BASE BEHAVIOUR - Good attachment - baby is confident to explore - CG = secure base
    • REUNION RESPONSE - Greet CG return with pleasure + seek comfort
    • 60 to what % of babies fall into the secure attachment type?
      75 %
    • 20 to what % of babies fall into the insecure-avoidant attachment type?
      25 %
    • What % of babies fall into the insecure-resistant attachment type?
      3
    • SECURE ATTACHMENT (high/moderate/low)
      • PROXIMITY SEEKING - Moderate
      • EXPLORATION/SECURE BASE - Moderate/High
      • STRANGER ANXIETY - Moderate
      • SEPARATION ANXIETY - Moderate
      • REUNION RESPONSE - High
    • INSECURE-AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT
      • PROXIMITY SEEKING - Low
      • EXPLORATION/SECURE BASE - High/Low
      • STRANGER ANXIETY - Low
      • SEPARATION ANXIETY - Low
      • REUNION RESPONSE - Low
    • INSECURE-RESISTANT ATTACHMENT
      • PROXIMITY SEEKING - High
      • EXPLORATION/SECURE BASE - Low/High
      • STRANGER ANXIETY - High
      • SEPARATION ANXIETY - High
      • REUNION RESPONSE - Low ( resist comfort after seeking it)
    • STRENGTH 1 - Good inter-rater reliability
      E - Observers agree on attachment type - controlled conditions + behaviour categories = easy to observe - Bick et al - 94 % of infants agreed on by researchers
      L - Objective not subjective judgements
    • STRENGTH 2 - Good predictive validity
      E - Type B ( secure ) babies involved in less bullying + better school achievement (Kokkinos 2007) - (Ward 2006) - better mental health
      L - SS measures something real + meaningful in development
    • LIMITATION 1 - Some don't fit into the 3 OG attachment types
      E - Main + Solomon (1986) - Type D ( disorganised ) - mix of avoidant + resistant behaviour -
      L - Findings could be invalid as some children ignored by Ainsworth - reducing reliability
    • Did Ainsworth or Bowlby conduct the strange situation?
      Ainsworth
    • LIMITATION 2 - SS not generalised to other cultures ( culture bias )
      E - Takahashi (1990) - Not used in Japan - rare for separation of mother + child - Incorrectly diagnosed with insecure - resistant due to high levels of separation anxiety - REUINION - Child immediately picked up (cannot see reaction)
      L - Hard to know what SS is measuring outside Europe + USA