Says that people strive to achieve fairness in their relationships
Walster et al (1978): when there is a lack of perceived equity, one person ends up overbenefitting and the other underbenefitting, leading to distress and dissatisfaction
Under benefit -> anger, hostility, resentment
Over benefit -> shame, guilt, discomfort
How does equity change over time?
Most dissatisfaction is caused when equity reduces over time in a relationship
Schafer and Keith (1980) surveyed married couples who felt inequity in their marriages due to an unfair division of domestic responsibilities
Wives felt under-benefited during child-rearing years and husbandsover-benefited
Equity and satisfaction was felt during the honeymoon and empty-nest stages
Suggests equity is important for the satisfaction of a relationship although it can change over the course of it
How do people usually deal with inequity?
Under-benefited will usually feel more motivated to make the relationship more equitable by communicating
Alternatively they make may make a cognitive change - will change their mindset to adapt to their partners' behaviour so they will no longer see a cost as negative and no longer feel dissatisfied
Could lead to low self-esteem, resentment, dissatisfaction in the long-term
What is one strength of the equity theory?
Research support: Utne et al (1984): measured equity in 118 recently married couples with 2 self-report scales and have been together for 2 years
Couples who considered their relationships equitable were more satisfied than those who saw themselves as under or over benefitting
Confirms that equity is linked with satisfaction in a relationship
What is one limitation of the equity theory?
Individual differences: Huseman et al (1987) identified 3 types of individuals
Benevolents: 'givers', tend to be more tolerant of under-rewarded inequity
Equity sensitives: behave in accordance with the theory and experience tension when faced with inequity
Entitleds: prefer to be over-benefitted and are dissatisfied when in an under-benefitted or equitable situation
Shows that the theory is not universal for every relationship and perception of equity is subjective
What is another limitation of the equity theory?
Cultural differences: equity may be undervalued or perceived differently in cultures outside of the US and Western Europe
Aumer-Ryan et al. (2006): found that American couples claimed to be in the most equitable relationships whereas Jamaican couples, particularly women, claimed to be in the least equitable relationships
Suggests that people from different cultures vary in how fair/equitable they consider their relationships to be, and could even be affected by individualism and collectivism
What is another limitation of the equity theory?
Gender differences: DeMaris et al. (2010) found that men and women are not equally affected by inequity in relationships
Women tend to perceive themselves as more under-benefitted in relationships and are more disturbed by this than men - greater investments into the relationship may make them more sensitive to injustices and inequity