River management scheme (Cockermouth)

Cards (5)

  • Why was the river management scheme needed in cockermouth?
    > Cockermouth floods Nov 2009
    • 31.4 cm rain in just 24 hours
    • Ground was saturated
    • Steep slopes (shorter lag time)
    • 2239 properties flooded
    > On the confluence of River Cocker/Derwent
    > Rivers hadn’t been dredged
  • What were the positives of the scheme?
    > 400 houses protected
    > Maintained character of the town
  • What were the issues with the scheme?
    > Cost £4.4 million
    > Storm Desmond in 2015 overwhelmed defences- ineffective
  • What hard engineering strategies were used?
    Hard engineering strategies used:
    • 120m self raising barrier
    • Glass panel flood walls
    • Reinforced concrete walls (one way flaps)
  • What were the soft engineering strategies used?
    Soft engineering strategies used:
    • 2000 trees planted
    • Flood action group. 62% of population to get texts
    • Restoration of river, flood plains and 350 hectares of peat lands before Cockermouth
    • River dredged regularly to remove gravel and increase channel capacity