Save
...
Case Study Facts
UK Physical Landscapes
River management scheme (Cockermouth)
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Finy.jc
Visit profile
Cards (5)
Why was the river management scheme needed in cockermouth?
> Cockermouth floods
Nov 2009
31.4
cm rain in just
24
hours
Ground was
saturated
Steep
slopes (shorter lag time)
2239
properties flooded
> On the
confluence
of
River
Cocker
/
Derwent
> Rivers hadn’t been
dredged
What were the positives of the scheme?
>
400
houses protected
>
Maintained character
of the town
What were the issues with the scheme?
> Cost
£4.4
million
> Storm
Desmond
in
2015
overwhelmed defences- ineffective
What hard engineering strategies were used?
Hard engineering strategies used:
120m
self raising barrier
Glass
panel
flood walls
Reinforced
concrete
walls (one way flaps)
What were the soft engineering strategies used?
Soft engineering strategies used:
2000
trees planted
Flood action group. 62
% of population to get
texts
Restoration
of river,
flood plains
and
350
hectares of
peat lands
before
Cockermouth
River
dredged
regularly to remove
gravel
and increase
channel capacity