-obtaining data by asking people questions and recording their answers
-a standardised set of questions is given to each respondent
-primary data and self report
-can include qualitative or quantitative data
outline open questions
-no fixed response
-allows respondent to provide own unique response
-does not limit possible answers
-produces qualitative data
Outline closed questions
-restrict respondent to a pre determined set of responses
-limits possible answers
-produces quantitive data
What is a likert scale
-ppts indicate their level of agreement on a 5 point scale
What is a rating scale
-ppts indicate strength of feeling towards a particular topic on a scale
what is a fixed choice option
-ppts select answers that apply to them from a list of prewritten questions
What things should be considered when designing questionnaires
-keep it simple and clear
-keep as short as possible
-keep it relevant to purpose
what other things should be considered
-ask for one piece of info at a time
-allow for don't know where appropriate
-be sensitive
-avoid overuse of jargon
define primary data
-Information that has been obtained first hand by the research for the purposes of a research project.
define secondary data
-Information that has already been collected by someone else and so pre-dates the current research project.
define quantative data
-Data that can be counted, usually given as numbers.
define qualitative data
-Data that is expressed in words and non-numerical.
strengths and weakness of primary
-S: Designed with the researcher’s objectives in mind.
-w: Time consuming.Costly.
s and w of secondary
-s: Cheaper option.Easily accessed.
-w: Data could vary in quality and accuracy (incomplete/ outdated etc).
strengths of quantitative
-Simple to analyse, compare and find trends
-More objective
-Less bias.
weaknesses of quantitative
-Narrower in scope and meaning.
-Doesn’t represent real life.
strengths of qualitative
-More rich, detailed data.
-Participants are able to expand on their answers/thoughts/feelings.
-Greater external validity.
weaknesses of qualitative
-Difficult and time consuming to analyse.
-Harder to compare and find patterns.
-Subjective.
-Open to bias.
outline how you could pilot and modify the questionnaires
-test q with group of ppts
-obtain feedback from them
-identify issues with q
-alter the problem q items
what is one weakness of questionnaire
-social desirability bias
-response bias
-acquiescence bias
-cost, time
-demand characteristics
-ethics
to assess external validity of questionnaires
-we need to consider how representative of the population the people who completed the questionnaires are
how could we assess internal validity in questionnaires
-Face validity: does the test look as if it is measuring what the research intended to measure, e.g. are the questions obviously related to the topic?
-Concurrent validity: this can be established by comparing the current questionnaire or test with a previously established test on the same topic. Participants take both tests and then the two test scores are compared
define internal reliability in questionnaires
-this is the measure of the extent to which something is consistent within itself. For example, all the questions on an IQ test should in fact by measuring IQ
to assess internal reliability
-Split-half method: a single group of participants all take a test once. Their answers to the test questions are divided in half.
The individual’s scores on both halves of the test should be very similar if the test is internally reliable
external reliablity means
-this is a measure of consistency over several different occasions, e.g. if a questionnaire is given to a participant on one day and then again a week later, their results should be very similar in order to be externally reliable
to assess external reliability
-Test-retest method: a participant is a given a questionnaire once and then again some time later.