An indirectinterference occurs where no direct force is used
what is the signififcance of the case of Adams v Ursell?
It shows how smell from farm animals, or from a fish and chip shop can amount to an indirect interference.
which case shows how smell from farm animals, or from a fish and chip shop can amount to an indirect interference?
Adams v Ursell
What is the significance of the case of Coventry v Lawrence?
It shows how noise from a speedway and motorracing circuit can amount to an indirect interference.
Which case shows how noise from a speedway and motor racing circuit can amount to an indirect interference?
Coventry v Lawrence
What is the significance of the case of Halsey v Esso Petroleum?
It shows how oily smuts from chimneys can amount to an indirect intereference
which case shows how oily smuts from chimneys can amount to an indirect interference?
Halsey v Esso petroleum
What is the signifcance of miller v Jackson?
It shows how cricket balls being hit into a garden can amount to an indirect interference
which case shows how cricket balls being hit into a garden can amount to an indirect interference?
Miller v Jackson
What is the significance of the case of Leaky v National trust and Holbeck Hall Hotel v Scarborough borough council?
Both cases show how slippage of earth can amount to an indirect interference.
Which cases show how slippage of earth can amount to an indirect interference?
Leakey v Nationaltrust and Holbeck Hall Hotel v Scarborough Borough Council
what is the significance of the case of Hutner v Canary wharf?
It shows how the interest being interfered with is one that is recognised by the law, for example, the right to receive television transmission isn't recognised by the law.
Which case shows how the interest being interfered with is one that is recognised by the law, for example, the right to receive television transmission isn't recognised by the law?
Hunter v Canary Wharf
what is the significance of the case of Fearn v Board of trustees of Tate Gallery?
It shows how the right to a view is not a protected interest by law
What case shows how the right to a view is not a protected interest by law?