Save
...
unit 2: section B
Rylands v Fletcher 2
5. Damage caused to C is reasonably foreseeble
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Anosh Eric
Visit profile
Cards (3)
The type of damage suffered by
C
must be a reasonably
foreseeable
consequence
of the thing escaping
what is the signfiicance of the case of •Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Council in terms of the damage suffered by the C?
It shows that the type of damage suffered by C must be a
reasonably foreseeable
consequence
of the thing escaping
which case shows that the type of damage suffered by C must be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the thing escaping?
Transco PLC v Stockport Metropolitan council