For

• Evidence 1: EWT is reliable

  • Issues of loftus and palmer methodology as EWT research misleading as focused on details tricky to estimate like speed, not crime
  • Based on a laboratory study so is artifical and lacks mundane realism

  THEREFORE: loftfus and palmers studies had some inaccuracies and issues with the methodology, so the study doesnt ensure us EWT are unreliable. This highlights EWT on crimes can be reliable
• Evidence 2:

  Foster: Real life crimes like robberies are less prone to leading questions and are more accuraye
• Evidence 3: new legal implications

  • Geiselman: cognitive interviews replaced leadig questions equalling to 35% more accurate information
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)

  THEREFORE: cost effective and efficient way of gathering information is now used to decrease memory bias and alteration