Non-ppt observations more appropriate ppt (6)

• Point 1:

  Non-participant observations are often seen as more appropriate than participant observations because they allow for greater objectivity.
• Evidence1:

  Since the researcher is not directly involved in the group, they are less likely to become emotionally involved or biased by group dynamics, which helps improve the validity of the data
• Evaluate 1:

  Additionally, non-participant observations are usually covert, reducing the risk of demand characteristics or social desirability bias that can occur when participants know they are being watched
• Link 1:

  The explanation highlights strengths like objectivity and reduced bias, but it also hints at limitations by implying that remaining outside the group might miss some depth
• Point 2:

  However, participant observations can offer deeper, more insightful data because the researcher experiences the situation from within the group
• Evidence 2:

  This insider perspective may reveal subtleties and meanings in behaviour that an external observer could miss.
• Evaluate 2:

  Yet, being involved may compromise objectivity and increase observer bias. Also, if the observation is overt, it may lead to altered behaviour due to awareness of being observed.
• Link 2:

  Therefore, while non-participant observations may be more appropriate for reducing bias and maintaining objectivity, participant observations might be better suited when detailed, context-rich insights are needed—meaning the most appropriate method depends on the research aim.