Social Identity Theory

Cards (83)

  • Social comparison
    The process of comparing one's in-group with out-groups.
  • Henri Tajfel
    A social psychology who, along with John Turner, developed SIT.
  • Minimal group paradigm
    An experimental procedure that involves creating groups based on nothing and then observing their behaviour.
  • Social categorization
    The cognitive process of thinking about people in relation to their in-groups and out-groups (in other words, mentally categorizing people into different groups)
  • Self-esteem hypothesis
    The claim in SIT that people compare their in-group with out-groups in a biased way in order to make themselves feel better.
  • Positive distinctiveness
    The act of making one's in-group better and different from an out-group.
  • Out-group homogeneity effect
    This term describes the psychological phenomenon whereby members of out-groups seem more similar to one another than members of an in-group.
  • In-group bias
    Acting more favourably towards your in-group than you do towards an out-group.
  • Discrimination
    Treating someone different because of a group they belong do. (usually refers to worse treatment).
  • Implicit racial bias
    A bias against members of a particular race that you're not consciously aware of.
  • Amygdala
    The part of the brain associated with implicit racial biases.
  • Klee and Kandinsky
    The name of the abstract painters that Tajfel and Turner led students to believe they were grouped based on their likelihood to like these painters.
  • Social Identity Theory was developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner
  • Tajfel's research was influenced by his personal experiences during World War II.
  • What does Social Identity Theory oppose regarding the causes of prejudice?
    Realist theories
  • Social Identity Theory opposes Realistic Conflict Theory, which suggests conflict is based on rational competition for scarce resources
  • What are the three stages of group formation according to Social Identity Theory?
    Social categorisation, identification, comparison
  • Social categorisation involves seeing yourself as part of a group.
  • What are the two categories of groups that emerge during social identification?
    Ingroup and outgroup
  • Social comparison involves viewing your ingroup as superior to the outgroup
  • Social comparison can lead to prejudice and discrimination.
  • What variable may influence how strongly someone identifies with their ingroup?
    Personality
  • Social comparison does not occur with outgroups that are irrelevant to your life
  • Football fans are more likely to compare themselves to supporters of rival teams in the same league.
  • What type of studies did Tajfel use to research Social Identity Theory?
    Minimal groups
  • In one study, Tajfel divided boys based on their estimates of the number of dots
  • The boys in Tajfel's minimal groups studies were randomly assigned to groups.
  • What task were the boys in Tajfel's studies given to allocate points?
    Matrices
  • In Tajfel's studies, boys awarded more points to members of their own ingroup
  • Boys in Tajfel's studies chose maximum difference over maximum joint profit.
  • What did Tajfel conclude about outgroup discrimination based on his research?
    It is easily triggered
  • Tajfel's research suggests that outgroup discrimination can occur without any competition
  • Football fans display Social Identification by wearing their team colors.
  • What is Social Identity Theory's explanation for prejudice in cliques?
    Self-esteem and status
  • Expanding social identity can help reduce prejudice
  • The song "We Are The World" aimed to challenge perceptions of starving Africans as an outgroup.
  • How did the Nazis use Social Identity Theory to unite Germans against Jews?
    By presenting Jews as an outgroup
  • Tajfel's minimal groups studies provide evidence for the credibility of Social Identity Theory
  • Minimal groups studies have been criticized for lacking ecological validity.
  • What did Tajfel suggest about the artificial tasks in his studies?
    Discrimination is more likely in real-world situations