a theory which suggests that there are two dimensions to self-disclosure: breadth and depth
breadth = range of topics covered. usually expands first in a relationship
depth = degree of private or personal info. more difficult to reach + includes painful memories + unusual traits that we might hesitate to share with others, so develops later
both are crucial for developing a relationship
sometimes compared to an onion
social penetration theory: altman + taylor (1973)
gradual process of revealing your inner self to someone else
giving away your deepest thoughts + feelings
reciprocal of exchange of information
this displays trust
romantic partners 'penetrate' more deeply into each others lives
self-disclosure given and received
an important distinction
level of self disclosure received in a relationship is a better predictor if liking and loving than the level of self disclosure given
another important social norm is reciprocity
most norms concerning behaviour involve some aspect of receiving returns for their own level of effort
in relationships, the norm is that self-disclosure should not be a one-way process
reciprocity: reis + shaver (1988)
point out for a relationship to develop and increase in breadth and depth, there needs to be a reciprocal bond + disclosure
disclosure needs to be responded with a reward or interest perhaps (something positive)
research support for the importance of reciprocal
self-disclosure in attraction
Sprecher et al. (2013) paired up unacquainted student volunteers and asked them to talk over Skype.
A 'reciprocal group took turns in asking questions and disclosing. A ‘non-reciprocal’ group had a one of the pair asking questions and the other answering… before swapping roles
Researchers measured perceived 'liking', ‘closeness', 'similarity' and enjoyment’
sprecher et al. findings
results suggest that mutual sharing of personal information builds trust and emotional intimacy, which are key to developing attraction and strong interpersonal bonds.
Supporting evidence for social penetration theory, from online relationships.
Rosenfeld and Thomas (2019) found that in 201739% of heterosexual couples (and higher proportions of same sex-couples) reported meeting their partner online.
Relationships formed over the internet often involve higher levels of self-disclosure in comparison to face-to-face relationships, but this can lead to
'Boom and Bust' (Cooper and Sportolari, 1997)
Rapid depth in disclosure (boom) not matched by breadth, leaving online relationships lacking strong foundations and basic trust leading to bust'
however...
Rosenfeld and Thomas (2012) found no evidence to support a 'Boom and Bust` pattern in online relationships.
There was no difference between online and offline relationships in ratings of relationship quality.
This suggests that online relationships are no different to face-to face relationships in terms of quality, despite possible differences in self-disclosure levels.
Theories of the role of self-disclosure in attraction may also be ethnocentric
Cultures tend to differ on the importance they place on personal self-disclosure.
Western cultures typically disclose more than non-Western cultures
This disclosure also tends to be more intimate.
Women disclose more than men
BUT... Nakanishi (1986)
Japanese women prefer a much lower level of disclosure than Japanese men.
This is the opposite.to, self-disclosure patterns found in Western cultures.