test 2

• why is colloquio (Ad Atticum 12.15) in the ablative?

  ablative of separation and careo takes an ablative
• what case is solitudine and why (Ad Atticum 12.15)?

  ablative of comparison
• why is hominum in the genitive in Ad Atticum 13.52?

  partitive genitive
• why is vaceret in the subjunctive (Ad Atticum 13.52)?


  result clause with ut
• why is diceres in the subjunctive? (ad atticum 13.52)


  relative clause of characteristic
• what construction is unum diem? (ad atticum 13.52)

  accusative of duration of time
• why is cogeret subjunctive? (Livy)

  subordinate clause in indirect discourse
• what case is prominenti and why? (Livy)

  dative participle of disadvantage
• what construction is eo ipso anon? (Livy)

  ablative of time when
• why is militum in the genitive? (Livy)

  genitive of possession
• what kind of condition is si temps...? (de bello gallico 4.20-22)

  simple condition; imperfect subjunctive and pluperfect subjunctive
• what construction is sibi magno usui?

  double dative; sibi is dative of reference, usui is dative of purpose
• in lines 5-7, what conditions are present? (de bello gallic 4.20-22)

  contrary-to-fact
• why is mercatoribus in the ablative? (de bello gallico 4.20-22)

  ablative absolute
• what case is institutis and why? (de bello gallico 4.20-22)

  ablative of means
• why is navium longarum in the genitive? (de bello gallico 4.20-22)

  partitive genitive
• what is the role of dum? (de bello gallico 4.23)

  introduces subordinate clause
• why is militibus in the dative? (de bello gallico 4.24-6)

  dative of agent
• what kind of cum-clause is coicerent and incitarent in? (de bello gallico 4.24-26)

  concessive cum clause
• what case does utor take?

  ablative
• what case is navium and motu and why? (de bello gallico 4.24-26)

  ablative of cause
• why is eveniret in the imperfect subjunctive? (de bello gallico 4.24-26)

  purpose ut-clause
• what type of clause is corhortati in? (de bello gallico 4.24-26)

  negative purpose clause; introduced by ne
• what is the case of libelli and why? (Catullus 1)

  genitive of the whole
• what case is saeclo and why? (Catullus 1)

  ablative of comparison
• what does ut convererat introduce? (Catullus 50)

  indirect statement
• what is the case of nostrum and why? (Catullus 50)

  partitive genitive
• what does ut + non indicate?

  negative result clause
• what case is labore and why? (Catullus 50)

  ablative of cause/means
• why is perspiceres in the subjunctive? (Catullus 50)


  relative clause of purpose
• why is sis and despuas in the subjunctive? (Catullus 50)

  indirect commands
• why is reposcat in the subjunctive? (Cattulus 50)

  negative purpose clause