AO3

• What did Allen and Levine find about independence in their study?

  Independence increased with one dissenter (64%)
• What does resistance to social influence enable individuals to do?

  Be free of pressure from the group
• Why is Allen and Levine's study considered a strength?

  It provides evidence for social support's importance
• What criticism is made about Allen and Levine's study?

  It lacks mundane realism
• What did Gamson et al find about resistance levels compared to Milgram's study?

  Higher levels of resistance were found
• Why did Gamson et al's participants show greater resistance?

  They provided support for each other
• What did Holland's study reveal about internals and externals?

  Internals resisted more than externals
• What percentage of internals did not continue to the highest shock level in Holland's study?

  37%
• What does the result of Holland's study suggest about locus of control?

  It may be more complex than initially thought
• What did Twenge et al analyze over a 40-year period?

  American obedience studies
• What trend did Twenge et al find regarding resistance and locus of control?

  People became more resistant but more external
• What limitation does Twenge et al's findings suggest about the theory?

  It may not accurately explain resistance
• What is a limitation of longitudinal meta-analysis mentioned in the study?

  Lack of control for the researcher
• What did Rotter et al find about locus of control in familiar situations?

  It has little influence
• What does Rotter et al's finding suggest about locus of control's applicability?

  It is limited in many situations
• Why is the locus of control still considered useful?

  It helps understand resistance in new situations