Coded mainly acoustically and lasts around 18 seconds
Capacity is around 7+-2 items
Long-term memory
Permanent store through rehearsal
Mostly coded semantically
Duration potentially a lifetime/forever
Capacity is unlimited
From the MSM, LTM to STM occur through retrieval
One strength of the MSM
It shows that LTM and STM are different
One limitation of the MSM
There is more than one STM store
Types of Long Term Memory
Episodic
Semantic
Procedural
Episodic Memory
Ability to recall events in our life
Time-Stamped in our life
Must make a conscious effort to recall episodes
Semantic Memory
Our knowledge of things, facts or meanings
Less personal but facts we all share
Not time-stamped
Procedural Memory
Our knowledge on how to do things
Without conscious control
Our ability to do things become automatic through practice
One strength of the types of LTM
Clive Wearing's case shows that there are more than one LTM store
One limitation of the types of LTM
Research for the location of LTM stores lacks validity
Central Executive
Supervisor role
It monitors data
It divides and sends out information to the different stores
Limited capacity
Does not store information
Phonological Loop
Deals with auditory information
Coding is acoustic
Divided into 2 parts
Research suggests
Left hemisphere for episodic encoding, right hemisphere for episodic retrieval
Research suggests that support for Long-Term Memories (LTM) is lacking in validity
Strength: Warrington and Shallice’s study on KF supports the idea of separate components in the WMM model
Strength: Dual tasking evidence supports the presence of different stores in the WMM
Limitation: Lack of clarity on the Central Executive component challenges the integrity of the WMM
Explanations for Forgetting
Interference, Types of Interference (Proactive, Retroactive)
Interference has been proposed for forgetting in the long term
Types of Interference: Proactive interference is when old information affects the new, Retroactive interference is when new information affects the old
Research: McGeogh and McDonald (1931) - Effects of similarity in memory
Research Findings: The most similar words (Synonyms) produced the worst recall
Research Conclusion: Interference is strongest when words are similar
Strength: Baddely’s and Hitch’s research on rugby players (1977) enhances the validity of interference in memory