Gopal Ganesh Agarkar

Cards (33)

  • Agarkar is commemorated for his work as a social reformer, rationalist, and educationist
  • Agarkar often wrote essays commenting on the nature of discourse on economics prevalent during his time
  • Agarkar's essays are of particular significance to understand his positions as a 19th-century liberal and the philosophical influences that propelled him to take those positions
  • The two essays that reveal Agarkar's economic thoughts are titled 'Teen Arthashastre' - broadly translated as 'Three Strands of Economics'
  • Agarkar opened his first essay with the analogy of an ongoing 'Tug of war' between the extremely ignorant people of India and a self-serving British government in India
  • Agarkar advanced suggestions for both the government and the people of India as a member of the third party of intellectuals
  • Economics is about production, distribution, and transactions or exchanges
  • India had a grave problem concerning production, distribution, and transactions due to foreign rule
  • Categories of then-existing views on economics
    • Axiomatic or Classical Economics
    • Practical Economics
    • Illusory Economics
  • Classical Economics tenets state that a government should stay away from interfering in production, distribution, and trade
  • The British government in India ignored the grave economic conditions and the effects of its economic policies
  • Agarkar believed political freedom and economic freedom were inseparably intertwined for Indians
  • The British valued India for trade access to other Asian countries more than for its resources
  • India's lack of consumerist culture led to dependency on British goods and services
  • India's economic drain and vulnerability to rustification were consequences of dependency on British goods
  • The government controlled the impoverished masses by offering temporary relief and various concessions
  • The government used its power supposedly for the redressal of grievances by pitting classes against each other and establishing ministries for agrarian affairs
  • The government used its power supposedly for the redressal of grievances
    At times sought to save the peasants by inflicting costs on the landlords - by pitting the classes against each other
  • The government opened up a ministry to manage agrarian affairs
    1. Manned it with intelligent bureaucrats
    2. Had a lucrative remuneration for which Indians paid through their tax money
  • None of the so-called agrarian reforms elevated the lifestyle of crores of poor Indians fundamentally
  • Agarkar: '"the fatal and deep wound of systemic impoverishment (that the economic policies of the government) inflicted on Indians could not be healed by mere band-aids."'
  • No amount of temporary relief could improve the economic condition of India
  • Increasing the volume of production (and subsequently trade) was the only suitable tonic that could impart vitality among Indians
  • Countries like France, the United States of America, Germany, Italy, Russia, Japan, Switzerland, and even England worked toward increasing trade when their industries were at a nascent stage
  • Indian thinkers like Justice Telang, Justice Ranade, and Dadabhai Naoroji had devised ways of stimulating Indian industries, commerce, and agriculture without violating the laws of economics
  • Agarkar: '"After all one can be woken up from slumber if they are asleep, how can a person who pretends to be asleep be woken up?"'
  • The general laws of classical economics were not entirely suitable for the prevailing conditions under British rule
  • The principles of classical economics cannot be applied to every society as their applicability hinges upon the level of economic development in a given society
  • If industry, if promoted, can create self-sustainable enterprises, it won't require the support of the state
  • Agarkar adhered to the view of Practical Economics
  • Agarkar considered Practical Economics a transitional arrangement to reach the ideals of Classical Economics
  • Agarkar wanted the state to create good conditions for industries to increase production, trade, and commerce
  • Agarkar rejected preferential treatment to products based on the place of their origin and opposed state or society-sponsored protection to businesses