Agarkar is commemorated for his work as a social reformer, rationalist, and educationist
Agarkar often wrote essays commenting on the nature of discourse on economics prevalent during his time
Agarkar's essays are of particular significance to understand his positions as a 19th-century liberal and the philosophical influences that propelled him to take those positions
The two essays that reveal Agarkar's economic thoughts are titled 'Teen Arthashastre' - broadly translated as 'Three Strands of Economics'
Agarkar opened his first essay with the analogy of an ongoing 'Tug of war' between the extremely ignorant people of India and a self-serving British government in India
Agarkar advanced suggestions for both the government and the people of India as a member of the third party of intellectuals
Economics is about production, distribution, and transactions or exchanges
India had a grave problem concerning production, distribution, and transactions due to foreign rule
Categories of then-existing views on economics
Axiomatic or Classical Economics
Practical Economics
Illusory Economics
Classical Economics tenets state that a government should stay away from interfering in production, distribution, and trade
The British government in India ignored the grave economic conditions and the effects of its economic policies
Agarkar believed political freedom and economic freedom were inseparably intertwined for Indians
The British valued India for trade access to other Asian countries more than for its resources
India's lack of consumerist culture led to dependency on British goods and services
India's economic drain and vulnerability to rustification were consequences of dependency on British goods
The government controlled the impoverished masses by offering temporary relief and various concessions
The government used its power supposedly for the redressal of grievances by pitting classes against each other and establishing ministries for agrarian affairs
The government used its power supposedly for the redressal of grievances
At times sought to save the peasants by inflicting costs on the landlords - by pitting the classes against each other
The government opened up a ministry to manage agrarian affairs
1. Manned it with intelligent bureaucrats
2. Had a lucrative remuneration for which Indians paid through their tax money
None of the so-called agrarian reforms elevated the lifestyle of crores of poor Indians fundamentally
Agarkar: '"the fatal and deep wound of systemic impoverishment (that the economic policies of the government) inflicted on Indians could not be healed by mere band-aids."'
No amount of temporary relief could improve the economic condition of India
Increasing the volume of production (and subsequently trade) was the only suitable tonic that could impart vitality among Indians
Countries like France, the United States of America, Germany, Italy, Russia, Japan, Switzerland, and even England worked toward increasing trade when their industries were at a nascent stage
Indian thinkers like Justice Telang, Justice Ranade, and Dadabhai Naoroji had devised ways of stimulating Indian industries, commerce, and agriculture without violating the laws of economics
Agarkar: '"After all one can be woken up from slumber if they are asleep, how can a person who pretends to be asleep be woken up?"'
The general laws of classical economics were not entirely suitable for the prevailing conditions under British rule
The principles of classical economics cannot be applied to every society as their applicability hinges upon the level of economic development in a given society
If industry, if promoted, can create self-sustainable enterprises, it won't require the support of the state
Agarkar adhered to the view of Practical Economics
Agarkar considered Practical Economics a transitional arrangement to reach the ideals of Classical Economics
Agarkar wanted the state to create good conditions for industries to increase production, trade, and commerce
Agarkar rejected preferential treatment to products based on the place of their origin and opposed state or society-sponsored protection to businesses