Works to enhance corporate culture and communication, employee management, increase efficiency, and productivity, train staff, and develop organizational leaders.
Creates structure, which is interdependent and inter-related.
Aims to develop employees as well as organization as a whole.
Dr. Elliot Jaques
“The Changing Culture of a Factory.”
Organizational and occupational
Three primary competencies for HRD
Career development
Training development
Organization and development people development
1943
The American Society for Training Directors was formed in Baton Rouge, LA
Len Nadler
“Father” of HRD.
HRD term coined by Nadler.
George Washington University
Nadler’s definition of HRD
“Those learning experiences which are organized, for a specific time, and designed to bring out the possibility of behavioral change.”
Swanson and Holton’s definition of HRD
“A process for developing and unleashing human expertise through organizational development and personnel training and for the purpose of improving performance.”
1993
AHRD (Academy of Human Resource Development) was founded.
Brigham Young and Dr. Wayne Pace.
Contributing principles to HRD
Psychology
Social psychology
Sociology
Anthropology
The goal of HRD
To improve individual, group, and organization effectiveness.
HRD benefits
Makes people competent.
Makes people committed to their jobs.
Can promote trust and respect.
Accept change within and organization.
Problem-solving.
Reliability
Same results over and over
Truthfulness or accuracy
Consistency
Validity
Measures what it’s supposed to.
MBTI criticism
Ideas born before psychology.
Up to 50% get a different time while re-taking the test.
Personality is not as clear as the test say.
Unreliable.
Extroversion
Attuned to external world.
Prefer to communicate by talking.
Sociable and expressive.
Learn best through doing.
Broad interest.
Action over reflection.
Introversion
Drawn to inner world.
Prefer to communicate in writing.
Private and contained.
Learn best by mental practice.
In depth interest.
Reflection over action.
Sensing
Factual and concrete.
Focus on what is real and actual.
Trust experience.
Oriented to present realities (what is).
Build conclusions carefully.
Detail oriented .
Like examples.
Prefer agendas.
iNtuition
Verbally creative.
Focus on patterns.
Trust inspiration.
Oriented to future possibilities (what could be).
Follow hunches.
Big picture oriented.
Desire change.
Thinking
Analytical.
Solve problems with logic.
Use reason to solve problems.
Can be “tough minded”.
Question first.
Want things to be logical.
Feeling
Empathetic.
Assess impacts of decisions on the people involved.
Use compassion.
Guided by personal values.
May appear “tenderhearted”.
Accept first.
Want things to be pleasant.
Judging
Scheduled.
Like things to be settled and ordered.
Make short- and long-term plans.
Try to avoid last minute stress.
Methodical.
Establish deadlines.
Perceiving
Spontaneous.
Like things to be flexible and open.
Adapt, change course easily.
Feel energized by demands.
Open-ended.
Dislike deadlines.
Groupthink
Irrational or non-optimal decision
Value harmony and coherence
Challenger disaster
Americans wanted it to succeed so no one spoke up about the potential problem
We make most of our decisions based on?
Emotions
What do we use first, then second to make a decision?
First emotions, then logic
The rider and the elephant
Rider is 1%, elephant is 99%
Elephant controls most and human only a small part
We have to focus on the elephant, not the rider
AristotelianPersuasion
Rhetoric: "The art of speaking or writing effective and/or persuasively."
Ethos - credibility
Ethos: the source's credibility, the speakers/author's authority, an appeal to character, ethical appeal
We tend to believe people whom we respect.
This respect may be automatic or it may be earned.
One of the central problems of argumentation is to project an impression to your audience that you are someone worth listening to.
Four dimension to ethos
Similarity: Does your audience identify with you?
Trustworthiness: Does you audience have reason to trust you?
Authority: Do you have authority on your topic? How do you prove it to your audience?
Reputation: How much expertise does your audience think you have on your topic?
Pathos - emotion
Pathos: persuading by appealing to the audience's emotions. Emotional appeals are one of the most powerful tools of persuasion.
Specific word and/or image choice, personal stories
Logos - logic
Logos: the logic used to support a claim (induction and deduction); facts and statistics used to help support the argument.
Persuading by the use of reasoning.
Statistics, facts, examples, reasons
Four logical fallacies
Ad Hominem
Strawman Argument
Appeal to Ignorance
False Dilemma
Ad Hominem
A fallacy of relevance where someone rejects or criticizes another person’s view on the basis of personal characteristics, background, physical appearance, or other features irrelevant to the argument at issue.
Appeal to Ignorance
Isn’t proof of anything except that you don’t know something. Appeal to ignorance doesn’t prove any claim to knowledge
Strawman Argument
A deliberate mischaracterizing the opponent’s position for the sake of deceiving others.
Ex. Parent: No dessert until you finish your chicken and vegetables. Child: You only love me when I eat.
False Dilemma
Black-and-white fallacy, either-or fallacy, “false dichotomy,” and “bifurcation fallacy.”
This line of reasoning fails by limiting the options to two when there are in fact more options to choose from.
Most important element of persuasion?
Pathos
DavidHume
Arguments cannot be won by using only logic
Active listening
Listen to complete message
Take notes
Show other person you are listening
Crossed arms and body language is a good indication someone is not listening
Ask open-ended questions
How does it make you feel when someone isn't listening to you?
Feedback
Is a gift --> getting fired shouldn't be a surprise