Cards (3)

    • Likert/Ranking Scale Questions
      • Fixed choices
      • Likert: Rate agreement
      • Ranking: Rank choice against other options
      • Improvements:
      Improvements:
      • Even number
      • Change order/ranking; avoid response acquiescence
      • Categories distinct + scales easy interpret
      Strengths:
      • Easy analyse/compare
      • Reliable + replicable
      • More flexible than closed + reflective of real views/opinions
      Weaknesses:
      • Lack depth/detail of open questions + qualitative data
      • Options may not match views, low valid + less accurate
      • Subjective interpretation, low reliability; inconsistent
    • Questionnaires
      • Predetermined questions
      • Done by individuals, or groups
      • Researcher absent
      External Reliability:
      • Lost over time, repetition difference
      • Use test-retest (participants do questions again)
      Face Validity:
      • Considering if each question measures construct
      • Consult expert
      Considerations:
      • Start easy (less defensive)
      • Use irrelevant ones; obscure purpose, avoid DC
      • Anonymous; avoid socially desirability
      • Unambiguous
      • No leading questions
      • Pilot study
      Strengths:
      • Private + anonymous; gives honest data, improve validity
      • Qualitative + quantitative data w/ open + closed questions
      Weaknesses:
      • Poor response rate (researcher absent); lowers generalisability
      • Difficult to phrase questions objectively
    • Interviews
      • Clear to elicit honesty + avoid social desirability
      • Start basic/less significant
      • More nervous + guarded start; less valid
      • Interviewer factor; age, gender, etc - researcher effects
      • Interviewer less aware of other cultural norms; inaccurate, uninformed assumptions
      • Need
      • Good communication
      • Good interviewer
      • Interviewee is eased
      Strengths:
      • Address sensitive issues
      • Good qualitative data source
      Weaknesses:
      • Work best with confident honest + articulate participants
      • Dependent on interviewers’ skills, especially when unstructured
      Structured
      • Standardised
      • Systematic/replicable
      • Reliable
      • Less detail, low valid
      Semi-structured
      • Question schedule, some flexibility
      Unstructured
      • Open-ended + previous answers
      • Need skilled interviewer good at rapport + analytical
      • Flexible
      • Detailed; learn beliefs under behaviour, high valid
      • Unreplicable/unsystematic
      • Subjective
      • Unethical: anonymous/confidential
    See similar decks