biological therapy

Cards (6)

  • chlorpromazine
    • typical (1st gen)
    • linked to original DA hypothesis
    • produced in 1950s
    • dosages of 400-800, maximum of 1000mg
    • tablet, syrup or injection
    • dopamine antagonist, reduced DA activity in synaptic receptors
    • used for sedation and to stop hallucinations
    • side effects:low mood an relaxation
  • clozapine
    • more common than chlorpromazine
    • atypical
    • 1970s, as typical wasn't working for sz
    • dosages os 300-450mg daily
    • not taken as injection due to lethal blood condition caused
    • dopamine, glutamate and seratonin antagonist
    • side effects: improved mood, good for suicidal patients
    • not much as a sedative as chlorpromazine
  • risperidone
    • atypical
    • 1990s, used to avoid Lethal blood condition caused by clozapine
    • dosages of 4-8mg daily
    • taken as Tabley, syrup and injection
    • dopamine and serotonin antagonist
    • lower dosage means less side effects
  • supporting evidence
    • research support for effectiveness
    • Thornley supports effectiveness as in 13 trials taking typical had less severe side effects than the placebo group
    • Meltzer found atypical (clozapine) was effective in 30-50% of treatment resistant cases when typical antipsychotics didn't work
  • limitation
    • serious side effects
    • typical are associated with urinary and sexual dysfunction
    • atypical are associated with weight gain and heart problems
    • suggest long term, antipsychotics may not be suitable as they can result in facial tics
    • fatal side effects of lethal blood condition which means people avoid taking treatments, making them ineffective
  • real world application
    • strength
    • if someone is having a severe psychotic episode, injecting them with chlropromazine to sedate and relieve symptoms is highly effective
    • also, by using typical as a sedative, people become more calm are more likely to engage in their other treatments (therapy)
    • counterpoint - chemical cosh argument, antipsychotics can be human rights abuse (moncrieff 2013). to administer sedative drugs in different dosages is abuse of human rights