The immediate objects of perception are mind-independent objects and their properties.
Indirect Realism
The immediate objects of perception are mind-dependent objects (sense-data) that are caused by and represent mind-independent objects.
Idealism
The external world is mind-dependent.
Direct realism is often thought of as the common sense theory of perception.
Differences in perceptual variation provide a problem for direct realism.
The argument from illusion provides a problem for direct realism.
The time lag argument provides a problem for direct realism.
Indirect realism says the immediate object of perception is sense data.
Sense data
The content of perceptual experience. It's not a physical thing, it exists in the mind. However, sense data is said to be caused by and represent mind-independent physical objects.
Primary qualities
Properties inherent in the object itself. Objective.
Secondary qualities
Powers of an object to cause sensations in humans. Subjective.
Berkeley questions how it's possible for mind-dependent sense data to resemble so-called mind-independent objects.
Indirect realism leads to scepticism about the nature and existence of the external world.
Veil of perception
We can't get beyond the sense data to access the external world behind it.
Russell argues that the existence of mind-independent objects is the best hypothesis to explain perceptions.
Locke offers two responses to the sceptical challenge.
Locke notes how he is unable to avoid having certain sense data produced in his mind when he looks at an object.
The immediate objects of perception (i.e. ordinary objects such as tables, chairs, etc.) are mind-dependent objects
Idealism
The view that there is no external world independent of minds, and we perceive ideas directly. The immediate objects of perception are mind-dependent ideas.
Unlike direct realism and indirect realism, idealism says there is no mind-independent external world. Instead, idealism claims that all that exists are ideas.
Idealism says that unless something is being perceived, it doesn't exist
Bishop George Berkeley: '"Esse est percipi" (to be is to be perceived)'
Berkeley argues that the very idea of mind-independent objects is inconceivable and impossible
Berkeley argues that everything we perceive is either a primary quality or a secondary quality, and both are mind-dependent
Berkeley's master argument is that we cannot even conceive of a mind-independent object because as soon as we conceive of such an object, it becomes mind-dependent
According to Berkeley, the cause of our perceptions is God, who constantly perceives everything even when we don't
Idealism makes no distinction between appearance (perception) and reality, which makes it difficult to explain illusions and hallucinations
Berkeley's response to the argument from illusion is that if something appears crooked, it is crooked, and the 'illusion' is just a mistake about future perceptions
However, the problem of hallucinations remains, as it is unclear why God would cause such perceptions
The main argument against direct realism is the problem of hallucinations or illusions, where our perception can be distorted by factors such as sensory input, mental states, or external influences.
Direct Realism is the view that we perceive objects directly, without any intermediary between us and them.
Direct realists argue that these experiences are not genuine perceptions but rather misinterpretations of what is actually happening.