Para 2: ethical & practical concerns with aversion therapy
• P: While aversion therapy can be effective, it raises ethical concerns due to the intentional induction or discomfort and distress.
• E: Rapid smoking, for example, forces individuals to smoke intensively until they feel ill. McRobbie (2007) found that although urges to smoke were reduced in the short term, long-term abstinence was not significantly better than a control group.
• E: furthermore, compliance can be a major issue, as individuals may simply refuse to take Antabuse or drop out due to side effects. Covert sensitisation, a more ethical alternative, uses imagined aversive consequences without causing physical harm and may be just as effective.
• L: therefore, while aversion therapy may work for some, it’s acceptability and practicality are questionable.