influenced by uncontrollable external factors (eg. prepared but not chosen for the job)
Interactionists - Crime
see crime statistics as a socialconstruction, links to the labelling of powerless groups in society.
SymbolicInteractionism *
micro-leveltheory
druguse seen as a socialphenomenon
people participate in drugtrafficking because is is seen as a desirablepath, influencedbysubculturalnorms and values
Becker (1966) - the labelling theory
"self-fulfilling prophecy", labels become internalised
primary deviance, the initial act of rule-breaking
secondary deviance, someone adopts the labels given to them
Becker - "Master Status"
a deviant label that contains an evaluation of an individual, is hard to shift from public perception
Lemert (1951) - primary deviance
the initial act of rule-breaking occurs before an individual is labelledasdeviantbysociety
Matza (1964) - "Delinquency and Drift"
young deviants don't completely reject social norms, they drift between conventional and deviant behaviours
"techniques of neutralisation", neutralise feelings of shame or guilt to justify actions: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of the victim, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties
Cons of interactionist approach
deviance normalised
inequality used as an excuse
fail to provide an explanation for the original deviant action, before the labelling theory takes place
'deterministic approach' - assumes that people live up to their label
neo-marxists argue that deviance can be a conscious act of rebellion, rather than a reaction to a label
Cohen
the mass media examines people’s behaviour and often judges and labels it in a negative way thus putting pressure on the state and the police to suppress behaviour that the mass media defines as deviant
Lemert
society makes it difficult for criminals to re-integrate into society because society stigmatisesdeviants and criminals
criminals fall back on the company of those who treat them normally, eg. other criminals and deviants
Left Realists
the labelling theory is guilty for over-romanticising deviance, neglecting the victims of crime and blaming the agencies of social control for causing crime
Ackers
deviants don’t need to wait until a label is attached to understand that what they are doing is wrong