Infants as young as two weeks old were able to imitate specific facial and hand gestures by a caregiver model
Brazelton et al
Still face experiment
Schaffer & Emerson
Carried out a study on families in Glasgow and from their observations they developed a 4-stage model of attachment formation, such as indiscriminate and discriminate attachments
Harlow
Found that monkeys provided with two surrogate mothers (one made of wire that provided food and one covered in a cloth) were more attached to the one that gave comfort rather than food
Lorenz
Demonstrated 'imprinting' by being the first thing that baby geese saw. They treated him as a caregiver and followed him around until adulthood
Bowlby
Tested his Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis by studying juvenile thieves. Found a significantly high proportion of them had been maternally deprived in early life
Ainsworth
Created the Strange Situation Method, from which she categorised three attachment types (secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant)
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg
Conducted a meta-analysis of different Strange Situation experiments from around the world and found secure attachment was always the most common, with variations between countries
Rutter
Carried out longitudinal research of Romanian orphans and found significant differences in the recovery and progress of those adopted before and after 6 months of age
Zeanah
Institutionalised (Romanian) orphans who had spent 90% or more of their lives in an institution were significantly more likely to show disinhibited attachment type than a 'normal' control who had not been in an institution
Hazan & Shaver
Conducted the 'love quiz', which was a retrospective questionnaire asking participants about their earliest attachments. Found a correlation between early attachment type and later romantic relationships
Simpson
Conducted a longitudinal study over 25+ years and found a positive correlation between participants' earliest attachments (using Strange Situation method) and future relationships, both friendship and romantic
Reciprocity
Parent and infant respond to the other's signals and each elicits a response from the other, like a sustained conversation. It is a two-way, mutual process involving turn-taking, from 3 months old
Interactional Synchrony
Mother and infant reflect / mirror both the actions and emotions of the other and do this in a co-ordinated (synchronised) way. Seen from two weeks
Quality of fathers' play with infants (not their initial bond) is linked to quality of later attachments – therefore fathers have a different role to mothers, to be a stimulating play mate not meeting emotional needs
Grossman
Responsiveness
Fathers can be effective primary caregivers (PCG). Research by Field shows PCG Fathers adopt behaviours typical of PCG mothers, e.g. smile more. So key to attachment is responsiveness of adult (e.g. smiling) not gender
Stages of Attachment
A child's development phases with regards to attachment. Who they respond to the most and how they respond to strangers. A longitudinal study conducted by Schaffer and Emerson
Asocial stage of attachment
In the first few weeks of life babies respond in the same way to humans and objects
Indiscriminate attachment
After 2-6 months, babies have a preference for familiar people but show no stranger/separation anxiety
Specific attachment
Around 7 months, babies have particular preferences for individual people and develop stranger anxiety shortly after
Multiple Attachments
Attachments to two or more people. This starts happening soon after specific attachment with one carer. For most babies they have multiple by 12 months
Animal Studies
Experiments carried out on non-humans, usually because it would be unethical to study humans experimentally in some behaviours. Influenced theories of attachment with people
Imprinting
Goslings follow whatever is the first large moving thing they see. Lorenz defined this
Sexual imprinting
The first bond (imprinting) affects mating preferences in later life. Lorenz found this with geese
Critical period (animal studies)
A key window of time in which the initial bond formed has long term impact on animals future. In geese if they didn't imprint in the first few hours they never would (Lorenz). In monkeys, the critical period was 90 days (Harlow)
Contact comfort
Infant monkeys preferred cloth covered surrogate wire monkeys to wire monkeys that provided milk. Harlow said it was because they provided comfort
Learning Theory of attachments
An approach to explaining why we form attachments that focuses on nurture - believes that children learn to associate parents with food, which is an unconditioned stimulus
Cupboard Love
The belief that children learn to love whoever gives them food (Dollard & Miller)
Classical conditioning (attachment)
UCS (food) produces UCR (feeling of pleasure). Caregiver (NS) is paired with food (UCS) and is associated with UCS. NS becomes CS, and produces pleasure (CR)
Operant conditioning (attachment)
Behaviours which bring the caregiver near (e.g. crying) are reinforced because produces caregiver response. Negative reinforcement – caregiver's response also reinforced as crying stops
Primary / secondary reinforcers
The association of the mother with the food (primary reinforcer) means the mother becomes reinforcing in her own right (secondary reinforcer)
Drive reduction
Infants are driven to reduce hunger (a primary drive). Attachment is secondary drive learned by association of caregiver with hunger satisfaction
Monotropic theory
The belief that we have an innate need to form attachments and that we must form a special attachment to one caregiver in particular, within a key window of time. This bond is influential in later relationships
Adaptive
Adaptive means when a trait gives a survival or reproductive advantage in a particular environment. In the context of monotropic theory, attachment gives a survival advantage
Social releasers
Innate 'cute' features and behaviours, which encourage attachment behaviour from parents
Monotropy
Special, intense bond with the mother (or ever present adult mother substitute) that is important for the development of internal working models
Critical Periods (Bowlby)
This refers to the time within which an attachment must form if it is to form at all (2 years / 30 months in humans)
Internal Working Models
The mental representations / schema of relationships, based of our attachment to our primary caregiver. These affect our future relationships because they become our expectations for what relationships are like
Continuity hypothesis
The belief that your initial attachment will correlate with your future adult relationships. Furthermore, that this will affect parenting style and so attachment types will continue over generations
Strange Situation
A controlled observation to test attachment type devised by Ainsworth. Infants are assessed on their willingness to explore and reactions to being left alone, left with a stranger and reunion with a caregiver. Assigned as type A, B or C