A method of interviewing that acknowledges that suspects are human beings and are more likely to cooperate with police if rapport is established and they are treated with respect
Ethical interviewing techniques (EI)
The aim is to reduce the number of falsestatements gained through police coercion
A report by the RoyalCommission on CriminalJustice in 1991 concluded that many false confessions and miscarriages of justice were the result of police using unethical interview techniques during questioning
This would involve the police interviewing people accused of perpetrating crimes, rather than eye-witnesses
The report was very critical and cited such things as police making threats, falsepromises and even using physicalforce to extract confessions
Since this time, there has been more of an emphasis on 'ethical interviewing' which aims to teach officers to keep a more open mind and behave lessaggressively towards suspects
Exoneration
Occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise
Baldwin (1992) reviewed 400 videos and 200 audio recordings of police interviews and concluded that the standards were low
Issues with police interviews identified by Baldwin (1992)
No rapport with suspect
Looking for confession
Attempts to get suspect to accept interviewers interpretations of events
Interviewers not appear to listen, often interrupt
Some were aggressive and took a macho approach
PEACE model of ethical interviewing
Developed in the early 1990s, a collaboration between law enforcement agencies and psychologists in England and Wales
Based on the idea that suspects are more likely to cooperate with the police, and hence give a true confession, if they feel relaxed, secure and not threatened
Principles of the PEACE model
Preparation and planning - identifying key objectives of the interview
Engage and explain - active listening to promote rapport
Account, clarification, challenge - using open-ended questions to elicit information
Closure - giving the suspect chance to ask any questions
Evaluate - reflecting on the interviewer's performance
All interviews that adopt the PEACE model are recorded to maintain transparency, and to ensure that guidelines for proper police conduct are being adhered to
Planning and preparation
1. The interviewer must be aware of all aspects of the investigation
2. They should plan the aims and objectives of the interview
3. Characteristics of the interviewee (age, culture, background) should be considered
4. Location of interview to be considered - In a private room - there may be a witness to take notes, recordings, two-way mirror
Explain & Engage
1. Objectives of interview should be explained
2. Reason for the investigation clearly explained
3. Reason for the arrest
4. Rapport has to be made to encourage conversation - important rapport starts at the very beginning
5. The interviewer should show empathy and be able to identify with the interviewee to build rapport
6. The interviewer must also have good communication skills by using tone and non-verbal communication to avoid discomfort of the interviewee
Account, clarification and challenge
1. Questions should be short, simple and open ended
2. Leading and multiple questions are ineffective
3. Obtaining an account of what occurred consists of prompting, supporting discussions eg "tell me more" "is there anything else you'd like to add" or simple nodding and humming
4. The interviewer should remain professional and not interrupt the interviewee and should ask for more detail when necessary
5. Interviewer must remain neutral and not have biases
Closure
1. Accurately summarising what was discussed
2. The interviewee should be made aware when the interview is coming to an end before it does
3. Interviews should not end abruptly which will cause distress
Evaluate
1. Interviewer should evaluate the interview in terms of if they achieved their aims and whether any furtheraction is required
2. Reflect on the interview and their practice
Strength of EI
It produces higher success rates
Holmberg and Christianson (2002) carried out a study of murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes
The researchers found that interviews characterised by intimidation and dominance on the part of the police interviewer were most associated with denials
In contrast, interviews marked by respect and a positive attitude towards the suspect were most associated with confessions
Therefore, EI may result in more cooperative interviewees
Weakness of EI
Some commentators remain wary of EI
Gudjonsson (1992) argues that some EI techniques are naive and that the 'social skills' approach to questioning should not entirely replace more persuasive methods
Kebbelletal (2010) found that presenting ethical interviewing techniques is more likely to get a confession compared to interviewer dominance
Evidence-presenting strategies, ethical interviewing and displays of humanity are effective in uncovering truth
The use of ethical interviewing has many practical applications to society as its use is linked to the improvement in the reliability of EWT as well as improving society's view of the police
Questionnaires were used in the study to collect data from the sex offenders who may have lied or exaggerated in their answers leading to social desirability bias, lowering the internalvalidity of the study even further
Walshe and Milne (2010) found that interviewers trained in ethical interviewing were not that good at building the rapport required
Walshe and Milne (2010) also found that the planning component is not being used correctly in the real world
This lack of rapport may negatively affect confession or that rapport is not necessary to gain a confession
Perhaps the PEACE model is difficult and timeconsuming for people to follow eg plan
Ethical interviewers need to have training to improve their communication skills
There may be limitations in cases where the police need a quick, economical turnaround therefore timing isn't feasible
Changes to police interviewing techniques illustrate how psychological understanding of memory processes has developed over time
The main techniques in CI are based on the understanding that memory is reconstructive and influenced by schema, ideas introduced by Bartlett in the 1930s
Subsequent research developed this idea in the context of eyewitness testimony
By understanding the frailty of human memory, cognitive psychologists have helped transform questioning techniques when dealing with eyewitnesses
This has been important in reducing miscarriages of justice
The CI is an excellent example of how insights from psychological research can have implications which stretch far beyond the laboratory, and evidence for its effectiveness is generally favourable (though some elements of the CI are more effective than others)
However, there is a trade-off because the increased amount of information may also mean an increase in inaccurate information