conformity to social roles

Cards (4)

  • Zimbardo's prison experiment(1973)
    aim: investigate how far people would conform to social roles
    procedure: A mock prison set up in the basement of Stanford University where 21 male student volunteers who were tested as 'emotionally stable' and were randomly assigned roles of prisoner or guard, they were encourages to conform to the role, to help they were given uniforms to their assigned roles and instructions about behaviour
    guards - uniform, wooden clubs, handcuffs and mirrored glasses
    prisoners - referred to as a number and given a uniform
  • Zimbardo's prison experiment results
    both groups conformed to their roles very quickly where the guards began to harass prisoners in aggressive ways leading prisoners to rebel, the prisoners would only talk about prison issues(forgetting about their real life) and snitch on other prisoners to please the guards
    the prisoners became depressed and anxious causing other psychological problems leading to the study ending after 6 days instead of 14
    showing social roles have a strong influence on behaviour
  • social roles evaluation strength
    research support: Hofling (1966) - observed behaviour of doctors and nurses in natural experiment (covert), found 95% of nurses obeyed a doctor (confederate) over the phone to increase the dosage of a patients medicine of what is advised, showing that everyday individuals obey an authority figure

    the participants were fully aware and completely debriefed about the aims and results of the study so it makes the experiment more ethically acceptable, they also had the opportunity to leave/withdraw at any point in the study
  • social role evaluation limitation
    it did not have the realism of a real prison as it was in a basement on Stanford university, Banauzizi and Movahedi (1975) - argued that they were merely play-acting rather than genuinely conforming to their roles as participant performances were based on characters from tv shows and acting how they thought they were supposed to act

    minimising the influence of dispositional factors: Fromm (1973) - Zimbardo may have exaggerated the power of social roles to influence behaviour as only 1/3 of the guards behaved brutally as some sympathised with prisoners