Save
...
Attachment
cultural variations
evaluation
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
klau
Visit profile
Cards (5)
Evalaute large sample
Ijzendoorn and kroonenberg meta-analysis - nearly
2000
babies
Increased
internal
validity because it reduces
anomalous
results caused by bad methodology or unusual participants
Confident
in our findings
evaluate sample unrepresentative of culture?
in the meta-analysis, comparisons were between countries not cultures
within countries, there are many different cultures with different
child-rearing
practices.
ijzendoorn
and
sagi
- found that distributions of attachment type in Tokyo were similar to the
western
studies
whereas, a rural sample had over representation of insecure resistant individuals
comparisons between countries may have little mearning
what is meant by etic?
cultural
universals
what is meany but emic?
cultural
uniqueness
evalaute method of assessment is biased?
the strange situations was designed by an american researcher based on a British theory
controversial whether
Anglo-American
theories and assessments can be applied to other cultures
imposed
etic
- trying to apply theory or techniques designed for one culture to another.
for example, lack of seperation= insecure attachemtn. but in
Germany
this behaviour might be seen as more independent than avoidance