Does Christianity tackle social issues more effectively than Marxism? - YES
Christianity accepts that suffering is a part of life and tires to engage with that at every level, but it is lost effective when it does so at a local level
each individual responds to the need to build the Kingdom of God in their own context, rather that the Marxist approach of tackling society on a larger scale
the reality of God can touch people’s lives in a very real way; Marx rejects religion and says it is too focused on the after life
Christians might say that religion is more about people in this world than about the afterlife
Does Christianity tackle social issues more effectively than Marxism? - NO
tackles social issues on a larger scale, Christianity assesses individual contexts
Christianity is too gentle when tackling poverty and oppression
the revolutionary uprising approach of Marxism is the only way to bring about significant change
Marx rejects religion and says it is too focused on the afterlife
Has liberation theology engaged enough with Marxism? - YES (too much)
Communism has been shown to be unsuccessful and so Christianity should not have lived itself with this approach
Liberation theology had lost sight of Jesus’ death on the cross, which liberations people from sin
liberation theology argues that praxis will bring about change, God’s grace will bring this about according to the Christian message
liberation theology underestimates the complexity of society, it suggests all issues can be counteracted by liberation theology alone
dangerous to engage with some of liberation theology, it has denied the importance of the individual and God‘s existence , leading to unorthodox beliefs entering the Church
Has liberation theology engaged enough with Marxism? - NO (not enough)
Marxism calls for an uprising, Christianity’s approach is too gentle to make an impact on social issues
fear of Marx’s atheism or promotion of violence has led his approach to be diluted too much
Christians talk about spiritual poverty and don’t focus enough on real, material poverty
Is it right for Christians to prioritise on group over another? - No
liberation theology prioritises the poor and oppressed over other groups - Jesus works for the poor (outcasts), but it is not just the poor who are outcasts
liberation theology could be over-emphasising the poor to the detriment of the rich: Jesus died for all people
Is it right for Christians to prioritise on group over another? - YES
it is not so much the rich that are condemned for being rich, but those rich people who do not help the oppressed