Cards (17)

  • What are the main features of science?
    Objectivity, replicability, falsifiability, theory construction
  • What does objectivity in science entail?
    • Keeping a critical distance in research
    • Avoiding personal biases in data collection
    • Ensuring participant behavior is not influenced
  • How do objective methods in psychology typically operate?
    They involve high control, like lab experiments
  • What is the contrast between objectivity and subjectivity?
    Objectivity is based on facts, subjectivity on opinions
  • What does the empirical method emphasize?
    Data collection based on direct sensory experience
  • What is required for a theory to be considered scientific?
    It must be empirically tested and verified
  • Why is replication important in science?
    It determines the validity of a finding
  • What does falsifiability mean in scientific theories?
    A theory must be testable and potentially proven false
  • How did Karl Popper differentiate between good science and pseudoscience?
    Good science is falsifiable, pseudoscience is not
  • What do psychologists avoid saying in their findings?
    They avoid saying 'this proves' in favor of 'this supports'
  • What is a theory in scientific terms?
    A set of general laws explaining events or behaviors
  • What is the role of hypothesis testing in science?
    To make clear and precise predictions based on a theory
  • What is a paradigm according to Thomas Kuhn?
    • A shared set of assumptions and methods in science
    • Distinguishes scientific from non-scientific disciplines
    • Examples include evolution and plate tectonics
  • Why does Kuhn consider psychology as 'pre-science'?
    It lacks a universally accepted paradigm
  • What characterizes natural sciences according to Kuhn?
    They have core principles accepted by the community
  • What happens during a scientific revolution according to Kuhn?
    A group questions the accepted paradigm due to contradictory evidence
  • Why does Kuhn argue psychology has not undergone paradigm shifts?
    It has too many internal disagreements and conflicting approaches