Tanzania-Resource Reliance

Cards (13)

  • Tanzania Local Scale Solution
    Goat Aid - Bottom-Up aid
  • Toggenbung goats
    -3L of milk everyday
    -£400 each
    -£200,000 pound donated
  • Conditions of getting goats
    • Villagers had to learn how to use them before getting them
    • Had to be repaid (if rule not placed goats would not be treated correctly)
  • Advantages of Goat Aid?
    • Earn triple
    • Pay for education
    • Improve farming methods
    • Improve food security
    • Buy items for themselves e.g. clothes
  • Disadvantages of goat aid
    • goats need water and it is scarce
    • Goats can damage land because of hooves and grazing
    • small scale project means small impact
    • poverty has increased even though hooved animals increased from 275 million to 655 million
  • What is a national scale attempt to solve food security?
    Tanzania wheat production
  • How did Tanzania grow wheat with the wheat program?
    • Request Canada for aid and got $95 million from 1968-1993
    • Programme covered 26,400 hectares in Hanang District
    • 60% of all of Tanzania’s wheat (food and jobs)
  • Disadvantages of the wheat programme?
    • yield was mostly low, could be cheaper to import
    • did not create too many jobs
    • the area was inhabited by Barabaigs which caused conflicts
  • Impacts on the people of Tanzania for the wheat programma?
    • Nomads forced off land
    • bread goes to urban rich not rural poor
    • loaf costs 63p on average £10 a week wages
  • What is another national scale project to solve food security?
    • SAGCOT - Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania
    • (Top-down scheme)
  • What is SAGCOT?
    a large project started ib 2010 to improve farming in Tanzania’s growth corridor
  • Why was this area of land chosen for SAGCOT?
    • very fertile land meaning better crop yields.
    • highways connect to major agri-zones to consumers in Dar, Arusha, Nairobi and Lusaka.
    • International airport connected
  • Disadvantages of SAGCOT?
    • small land owners not been involved in decision making
    • mostly beneficial for commercial farms
    • Nomadic tribes losing access to water