Observed adults with 4-6 month olds; babies assumed as boy - be adventurous, active and given hammer-shaped toy, babies assumed as girls - be passive, play with doll and praised for pretty therefore gender-appropriate behaviour stamped from young, via differential reinforcement (encouraged to show distinct acts), supports SLT explanation
Imitation of behaviour not until later in age; modelling doesn't occur from birth, eg motor reproduction - kids aren't physically nor intellectually capable to perform act, fits Kohlberg's theory - capable from gender constancy therefore not consider influence of age and maturation, undermines the mediational process = low internal validity
Lessdistinction between masculine and feminine behaviour than in 1950s; there's a shift in social expectations and cultural norms over time, new forms of acceptable gender behaviours therefore explains shift better than biological approach because there's not been a change in people's basic biology - only behaviours
Freud's unconscious internal conflict between tripartite personalities vs conscious mediational processes
Mediational processes occur through identification where the child will choose their model and decide if they want to imitate based on consequences. There's psychic determinism in the unconscious internal conflict because they'll have no control over the conflict resolution thus no control of own gender development therefore unconscious forces more important than social influences in gender development, undermines influence of social learning