infants respond similarly to human objects and non-human object although still respond more to familiar humans
reciprocity and IS plays a role
stage 2 : Indiscriminate stage
infants are more social and prefer human company than inanimate objects and can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people
don't tend show separation anxiety or stranger anxiety
stage 3 : specific attachment stage
start to show separation anxiety when particular person leaves
start to show signs of stranger anxiety
65% signals of the time it is with the mother
stage 4 : multiple attachment
develop a wider circle of multiple attachments
display separation in theses relationship
29% of babies had multiple attachment within a month of forming a primary one
by 1 year had 75% of multiple attachment
Schaffer and Emerson Glasgow project:
investigate formation of early attachment, in particular the age at which they developed their emotional intensity
60 infants 31 male 21 female
mothers were visited every 4 weeks and then again at 18 months
mothers kept a diary
50% showed separation anxiety towards a particular adults between 25-32 weeks and formed a primary attachment
65% usually mother
29% attached to mutiple
75% had an attachment with their fathers as a secondary attachment
argued that the study had good external validity
Schaffer and emerson study was carried out in the families own homes and done by parent
means that babies behaviour was not affected by external people
took place largely in every day setting, it could be said to have good external validity
however, mothers carried observations by themselves
may have reported biased findings eg/ if they were tired, they may have not been so positively receptive to their babies who may then demonstrate anxiety
may not have been truthfully recorded
therefore even if babies were natural, may not have been recorded accurately
evidence may be poor for the asocial stage
babies may have poor coordination and are generally pretty much immobile, difficult to make judgements about them based on observation of their behaviour
difficult to come to strong conclusions
therefore babies may actually be quite social but due to flawed methods in observations of caregivers, they appear to be not social
another problem is that the sample was very specific geographically and socially
sample size was 60 and large amount of data gathered
same part of glassgow and working class familiy
child rearing practices differe from culture to culture and have changed alot since that 1960s
eg/ collectivist cultures, multiple attachment form from an earlier age
does not generalise well to other social and historical context