A03

Cards (5)

  • * high reliability?
    • due to controlled environment & standardised procedure means that s.s can be easily replicated
    • main & kaplan & cassidy 1985 tested babies at 18 months
    • retested at 6 years old
    • found that 100% of secure babies were still classfied as this
    • 75% of avoidant still under same classification
    • reliable
    • highly similar replicated findings demonstrate consistency of s.s technique as a tool for measuring att types
  • X ethical guidelines broken?
    • while mothers gave consent to take part infants cannot
    • s.s may be stressful for infants as being taken away from their cg to measure att behaviour
    • breaks guideline of protection from psychological harm
    • ? credible
    • some infants may find procedure intensely distressing
    • is unacceptable research practice
    • suggests more ethical methods should be devloped to measure att behaviour
  • X culturally biased?
    • s.s does not have same meaning outside of western europe & usa
    • cultural differences in childhood experiences more likely to mean that kids respond differently to s.s
    • e.g israeli kids live in kibbutz rarely encounter stranger so in s.s stranger anxiety is different experience then for americans
    • cgs from diff cultures behave differently in s.s
    • takhashi 1990 noted test does not work in japan
    • japanese mothers rarely separate from babies so very high levels of separation anxiety shown
    • ? population
    • cannot be generalised as tool for measuring att in all cultures
  • X lacks ecological validity?
    • ainsworth conducted observation in controlled environment
    • children may have acted differently to how they would act in more familiar environment
    • so dont know if behaviours displayed would be same as when in familiar setting
    • ? ecological
    • is difficult to generalise findings to real life att
  • * strongly predictive of later development?
    • found that babies assessed as secure typically go on to have better outcomes in many areas
    • ranges from success at school/romantic relationships/friendships in adulthood
    • internal
    • shows its an accurate measure of att behaviour
    • can predict outcome of future relationships