Power is only the capacity to influence and anything can be a source of power if it gives the negotiator a temporaryadvantage over the other party
People acquire power in 4 ways:
Informational sources of power
Power based on position in an organization
Relationship-based sources of power
Contextual sources of power
Information is the most common source of power:
Derived from the negotiator’s ability to assemble and organize data to support his or her position, arguments, or desired outcomes
Power derived from expertise is a special form of information power
A negotiator who would like to take advantage of their expertise needs to show that expertise:
Actually exists
is relevant to the issues under discussion
Two major sources of power in an organization
Legitimate power, grounded in the title, duties, and responsibilities of a job description and “level” within an organization hierarchy
Power based on the control of resources associated with that position
The effect of legitimate power is when people respond to directions from another because they feel it is proper for the other to direct them.
People can acquire legitimate power in several ways:
At birth
Election to a designated office
By appointment or promotion to some organizational position
An individual who has a generalized respectful position (e.g. priest)
Effectiveness of formal authority is derived from the willingness of followers to acknowledge the legitimacy of the organizational structure and the system of rules and regulations that empowers its leaders.
Legitimacy doesn’t only speak about authority:
Legitimacy power of reciprocity (if someone does a good thing, a good thing needs to be done back)
Legitimacy power of equity (fairness)
Legitimacy power of responsibility of dependence (obligation to help others who cannot helpthemselves)
People who control resources have the capacity to give them to someone who will do what they want, and withhold them (or take them away) from someone who doesn't do what they want.
Some of the most important resources:
Money
Supplies
Human capital
Time
Equipment
Critical services
Interpersonal support
Power also comes from location in an organizational structure, but not necessarily a hierarchical structure
In this case, power is derived from whatever flows through that particular location in the structure (usually information and resources, such as money)
Leverage comes from the ability to control and manage what flows through that position (without a formal position)
Power is based in the context, situation or environment in which negotiations take place
BATNAs Offer a negotiator significant power because they now have a choice between accepting the other party’s proposal or an attractive alternative deal
4 contextual sources of power:
context, situation, or environment
BATNAs
Culture
Agents, constituencies and external audiences
Tips for dealing with others who have more power:
Never do an all-or-nothing deal
Make the other party smaller
Make yourself bigger
Build momentum through doing deals in sequence
Use the power of competition to leverage power
Constrain yourself
Good information is always a source of power
Do what you can to manage the process
It is important to keep in mind that you do not need power to be persuasive
There are numerous techniques negotiators can use to change their counterparts’ attitude and behaviour
2 routes to persuasion:
central route
peripheral route
Central route --> a type of influence using direct behaviours and statements that quite literally convince the other side that your arguments are valid and worthy of consideration
Peripheral route --> a type of influence relying on indirect behaviours and manipulation of subtle cues that lead the other party to change his or her behaviour or attitude almost subconsciously
There are three major issues to consider when constructing a message:
The content of the message (Facts and topics that should be covered)
The structure of the message (Arrangement and organization of the topics and facts)
The delivery style (How the message should be presented)
using vivid language and metaphors
Message Content
Make the offer attractive to the other party
Frame the message so the other party will say “yes”
Make the message normative – by following a course of action he will be acting in accordance with both his values and some higher code of conduct (e.g. “save a tree”)
Suggest an “agreement in principle”
Message Structure:
One-sided messages: ignore arguments and opinions that might support the other party’s position
Two-sided messages: mention and describe the opposing point of view and show how and why it is less desirable
Message components
Negotiators can help the other party understand and accept their arguments by breaking them into smaller, more understandable pieces
Use vivid language and metaphors:
Have major effect on persuasiveness
People under stress are more receptive to low intensity language and more inclined to reject those using high-intensity language
Excessive use of metaphors or overly vivid descriptions may lead the other party to believe you are filled with “filled with hot air”
peripheral route to persuasion:
The receiver attends less to the substance of persuasive arguments and is instead susceptible to more “automatic” influence through subtle cues
Usually occurs when the target of influence is either unmotivated or unable to attend carefully to the substance contained within a persuasive message
2 aspects of messages that foster peripheral influence:
Message order
Distractions
Message order
When topics are familiar, interesting, or controversial to the receiver, the important points should be made early, exposing the receiver to the primacy effect
When the topic is uninteresting, unfamiliar, or not very important to the receiver, the most critical point should be placed at the end of the message to take advantage of the recency effect
3 source characteristics that foster peripheral influence: