Save
psychology
attachment
schaffer and emerson
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
hilary kemayou
Visit profile
Cards (14)
what did schaffer and emerson investigate
the
formation
of
early
attachments
explain schaffer and emersons study into the formation of early attachments
60
babies
31
= male
29
= female
all from
glasgow
skilled
working class
families
babies and their mothers were visited every
month
for the
first
year then again at
18
month
researchers interviewed the mother
measured
separation
anxiety and
stranger
anxiety
what were the results of schaffer and emersons study
25-32
weeks
50
% had
separation anxiety
(specific attachment)
40
weeks
80
% had
specific attachments
40
weeks
30
% had
multiple attachments
how many stages of attachment are there
4
what are the four stages of attachment
stage 1 -
asocial
stage
stage 2
-indiscriminate
stage
stage 3-
specific
attachment
stage 4 -
multiple
attachment
what is the asocial stage
the first few
weeks
of a babies life
babies behaviour to
non-human
objects and humans was the
same
shows
preference
to humans
happier
when around humans
what is the indiscriminate stage
2-7
months
display more
observable social
behaviour
recognise and prefer
familiar
adults
accept cuddles
from any adult
behaviour isn't
different
to any one person
what is specific attachment
around
7
months
show
separation
and
stranger anxiety
has a
primary
attachment figure
what is multiple attachment
once forming a
specific
attachment babies begin to form
secondary
attachment figures
approx at
1
years old
why does schaffer and emersons study have good eternal validity
carried out in the
families home
observations were carried out by the
parents
during
ordinary
activities
behaviour of babies was
unaffected
by the observers presence
so babies most likely behaved
naturally
what is the issue with the sample used in schaffer and emersons study
limited
sample characteristics
sample
size
of
60
babies may be slightly
small
all babies were from
glasgow
all babies were from the same
social
class
study was conducted over
50
years ago
cannot not
generalise
findings to other
social
and
historical
contexts
why is it good that schaffer and emerson used a longitudinal design
children were
followed
up and
observed
regularly
a
quicker
method would've been to observe the children at
different
ages
longitudinal designs have better
internal validity
there are no
confounding
variables of
individual
differences between ppts
what is the problem with studying the asocial stage
babies that are a few weeks old have poor
coordination
and are essentially
immobile
difficult to make any
judgements
based on observations
there aren't many
observable
behaviours
therefore evidence cannot be
relied
on
explain the conflicting evidence on multiple attachments
not clear when a child forms
multiple attachments
most find that
multiple attachments
forms once the child has a
single attachment
psychologists working in
collectivist
cultures find that babies form
multiple attachments
very
early
on
collectivist
cultures value working
together