Poor Management - the most common reason for organizational failure
Lack of coordination - work unfinished, teams isolated, out-of-step
Excessive Conflict - needless friction among internal groups
Unclear roles - functions overlap and/or fall through the cracks
Gap in skills / Misused resources - missing or underutilized skills or resources
Poor work flow - disruptions, cumbersome processes
Reduced Responsiveness - slow reactions to environmental shifts
Conflicting communications - external stakeholders confused or complaining
Low staff morale - lack of confidence or drive; poor teaming
Good System of Management - the key to success and profitability
Organized Management Structure - the key to a good management system
Failure to adapt the organization structure, policies, and procedures to the growth in size and complexity of the enterprise leads to stagnation or failure.
Management Structure - facilitates the coordination and control within a company
Management Structure - considers environmental factors, technology, culture, and measure of effectiveness
Environment – both external & internal to the organization
Technology – range of technical structure to support daily operations
Culture – desired culture; may develop sub-cultures
Measure of effectiveness – resources used to implement strategies & report results.
In any size of organization, there must be delegation of responsibility
Delegation - entrusting others with responsibility and authority in work, creating accountability for results.
Advantages of Delegation
Relieves manager for more challenging jobs
Leads to motivation of subordinates
Facilitates efficiency and quick actions
Improves employee morale
Develops team spirit
Maintains cordial relationships
Facilitates management development
Guidelines for Effective Delegation
Be clear in the objectives of the task
Determine and Monitor what each worker can most effectively accomplish
Determine if the person has the appropriate resources
Lines of Authority: - represents the chain of command. This determines “Who is in-charge of making decisions”
Lines of Responsibility: - determines “who is responsible for whom” and “who is responsible to whom”. It must be FIXED and CLEAR.
The degree of control within an organization helps determine the levels of which higher authorities, as well as subordinates, in an organization assume responsibility and authority.
Effective management also depends on the ability & skills of personnel to perform work.
There is a limit to the number of employees a manager can effectively attend to.
This pertains to the capability of employees to assume leadership roles in the firm.
Coordination - unification, integration, & synchronization of the efforts of group members to provide unity of action in the pursuit of common goals
Facilitation - the process of designing and running a successful, productive meeting
Line Organization Structure - simplicity and straight-forwardness of the structure. The division of authority and responsibility can clearly be seen. Also, there is a clear channel of communication
Line and Staff Organization - the initial line structure was enhanced by providing specialized staff positions like the employment manager and the process engineer which can aid and give counsel to the superintendent and foreman
Functional (Pure) Organization - all the different clerks are given authority over all three worker types, which means that they can all give responsibilities to them. In this, the dilemma of the multiplicity of bosses and blurred lines of authority and responsibility can cause more harm
Line and Functional Staff Organization - structure of the organization gives importance on setting limits and boundaries to each role, allowing managerial roles to prioritize executive training and responsibilities, and staff roles to further their specialized knowledge.
Committees - formed for the performance of special duties in the company. They may either be permanent (standing) or may be organized to serve a temporary function only (ad hoc).
Basic Principles of a Committee Organization
The organization of the committee should grow out of a need that is recognized by representative of a department and the personnel affected.
The members of a committee should be representative of the function and the personnel concerned and these members should represent variation in opinion among personnel
Duties, authorities, and responsibilities must be clearly defined
The organisation and operation of a committee should be a cooperative development
Slow action and wasted time are characteristics of the democratic process wherever applied, but such weaknesses are a small price to pay for the values of pooled judgment, eventual understanding, and agreement.
As for the dissolution of inactive committees, this can be overcome by clarifying their purposes and fixing a definite time for their termination.