Encouraging/Assisting Crime

Cards (33)

  • What Act covers Encouraging/Assisting Crime?
    Serious Crime Act 2007
  • What is stated in the Serious Crime Act about D committing a full offence?
    D liable for assisting or encouraging another to commit a full offence, regardless of whether the full offence is actually committed or not.
  • What does s44 of the 2007 Act cover?
    s44: Intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence
  • What does s45 of the 2007 Act cover?
    s45: Encouraging or assisting an offence believing it will be committed
  • What does s46 of the 2007 Act cover?
    s46: Encouraging or assisting offences believing one or more will be committed.
  • What is stated in s44 (1)?
    s44 (1): D does an act capable of encouraging/assisting the commission of an offence, and he intends to encourage/assist its commission.
  • What is stated in s44 (2)?
    (2): No such intention exists if encouragement or assistance is merely a foreseeable consequence of his conduct.
  • What is the AR for s44?
    1. D must be shown to have done an act/omission
    2. Capable of encouraging/assisting an offence
  • What is the MR for s44?
    1. Intention to encourage/assist
    2. State of mind
  • Will D still be guilty even if P did not use the items provided?
    YES
  • What is irrelevant for the second AR element: Capable of encouraging or assisting another?
    • Irrelevant whether D’s conduct actually assisted/encouraged another.
    • Irrelevant whether P became aware of D’s assistance/encouragement.
  • Does the assistance have to be substantial?
    NO:
    Does not have to be a substantial assistance as an act which is capable of assisting the commission of an offence to a small extent could be sufficient e.g providing guidance is sufficient (D placing a gun for P)
  • What is stated in s65 (1):
    s65 (1): encouraging may be by persuasion or threats
  • What is stated in s65 (2)?
    States that reducing the possibility of a criminal conviction can constitute assistance
  • What is the main difference between s44 to s45 & s46 in terms of MR?
    D must intend for his conduct to encourage/assist the full offence (is the reason why s44 is the most serious of the offences)
  • What is stated in s44 (2)?
    s44 (2): indirect intention or foresight is not sufficient.
  • How is State of mind defined in s47 (5)?
    Where:
    • D foresaw or intended that P had the necessary MR for the offence, or D himself had the MR for the offence.
    • D foresaw or intended circumstances required for the AR of the offence
  • What is stated in s47 (2) regarding D's state of mind?
    s47 (2): makes it clear that it is enough that D wanted the other person to do the acts which would amount to an offence; D does not have to know the conduct is a particular crime
  • What does s47 (5) (b) cover?
    If the offence requires proof of particular circumstances or consequences, two factors must be proven
  • What are the two factors that must be proven for s 47 (5) (b)?
    • (i): D intended [s44] or believed [s45 & s46] that, were the acts to be done, it would be done in those circumstances or with those consequences or
    • (ii): D was reckless as to whether or not it would be done in those circumstances or with those consequences
  • How does s45 define Encouraging/assisting an offence believing it will be committed?
    • (a): D does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and
    • (b): D believes [not intends] that the offence will be committed; and that his act will encourage or assist its commission
  • What is the AR for s45?
    1. An act
    2. Capable of encouraging/assisting an offence
  • What is the MR for s45?
    1. Belief the offence will be committed
    2. Belief that his conduct will encourage or assist the offence
    3. State of mind
  • How is the MR different for s45 different for s44? (Belief that the offence will be committed)
    Unlike s44: there is no need to prove intention. Belief is sufficient.
  • What is the L.P of Watling?
    L.P: D must believe the offence WILL be committed; a belief that it MIGHT be committed is not sufficient 
  • What belief is also sufficient for s45?
    Conditional or mistaken belief may be sufficient.
  • What is stated for the 2nd MR element for s45: Belief that his conduct will encourage/assist the offence?
    • Unlike s44, there is no need to prove the intention
    • Does not apply to conspiracies, attempts & some statutory incitement offences as offences require intention
  • How does s46 define Encouraging/assisting offences believing one or more will be committed?
    • s46 (1): D does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of one or more of a number of offences; and
    • D believes that one or more of those offences will be committed (but has no belief as to which); and
    • D believes that his act will encourage/assist one or more of them
  • When can s46 apply?
    Applies when D is assisting & encouraging P but does not know what crime P might commit
  • What is the AR for s46?
    1. An act
    2. Capable of encouraging/assisting an offence
  • What is the MR for s46?
    1. Belief that one or more of the offences will be committed
    2. Belief that his conduct will encourage/assist one or more of them
    3. State of mind
  • How is the MR for s46 different to s44 & s45? (Belief that one or more of the offences will be committed & Belief that his conduct will encourage/assist one or more of them)
    • Unlike s44, there is no need to prove intention. Belief is sufficient.
    • Unlike s45, D does not need to believe that a specific offence will be committed.
  • What types of beliefs can be sufficient for s46?
    Conditional or mistaken belief may be sufficient.