Most of the country would have favoured the Political Presbyterians because of their peace policy
In 1646 the Political Presbyterians were the most influential group
Charles had accepted reasonable terms presented to him by the Political Presbyterians
The country was weary of war and wanted peace
If the Political Presbyterians had succeeded, then the country would have gone along with the agreement
Newcastle Propositions
The Political Presbyterians' plan for settlement presented to Charles in July 1646
Main features of the Newcastle Propositions
Charles to accept the establishment of Presbyterianism in England for three years
Parliament to control the militia (the armed forces) for 20 years
The Triennial Act to remain, guaranteeing regular parliaments
Only 58 Royalists not to be pardoned
Charles' response to the Newcastle Propositions was to stall
Settlement was hampered by Parliament's political divisions, which were deepened by religious differences
In the winter of 1646-47, the Political Presbyterians tried to get the king to agree to a revised, more lenient version of the Newcastle Propositions
The Political Presbyterians' strategy
Demobilising the New Model Army but keeping a smaller force to go to Ireland to crush the Irish Catholics
Creating an alternative 'safe' army based on the London Trained Bands
The Political Presbyterians' leader, Denzil Holles, further abused the New Model Army in a document subsequently referred to as the Declaration of Dislike
The Political Presbyterians' strategy was based on the fact that Parliament faced a huge financial problem: they owed the army £3 million, when royal revenues before the war had never amounted to as much as £1 million
The Political Presbyterians' strategy inadvertently brought a new radical force into the politics of settlement: the New Model Army