Extremities warm and equal bilaterally, all pulses present and equal
Sensory modalities intact in legs and feet, no lesions
The examiner analyzed and interpreted all the data, clustered the information, and identified the diagnoses
Assessment
The collection of data about the individual's health state
Diagnostic reasoning
The process of analyzing health data and drawing conclusions to identify diagnoses
Components of hypothetico-deductive diagnostic reasoning
Attending to initially available cues
Formulating diagnostic hypotheses
Gathering data relative to the tentative hypotheses
Evaluating each hypothesis with the new data collected, thus arriving at a final diagnosis
Cue
A piece of information, a sign or symptom, or a piece of laboratory or imaging data
Hypothesis
A tentative explanation for a cue or a set of cues that can be used as a basis for further investigation
Developing a preliminary list of significant signs and symptoms for all patient health needs is less formal in structure than the final list of diagnoses
Clustering data
Grouping together assessment data that appear to be causal or associated
Experienced examiners cluster data more rapidly because they recall proven results of earlier patient situations and recognize the same patterns in the new clinical situation
Validating data is an essential critical-thinking skill to ensure accuracy
Critical thinking
The means by which we learn to assess and modify, if indicated, before acting
Critical thinking is required for sound diagnostic reasoning and clinical judgment
Rates of incorrect diagnoses are estimated to be as high as 10% to 15%, and one of the primary causes of misdiagnosis is the clinician's bias
Priority setting
Assigning high priority to first-level problems like airway, breathing, and circulation, then second-level problems like mental status changes and abnormal lab values, and finally third-level problems like lack of knowledge and mobility issues
Patients often require the assistance of an interdisciplinary team of practitioners to treat complex medical problems
Outcomes need to be measurable and include patient input to facilitate active participation in care
Interventions to treat complex medical problems
1. Long term
2. Require collaborative effort between patient and health care professionals
Health is complex and requires input from a variety of specialties (e.g., physical therapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy)
Patients are more likely to participate actively in care and follow through with recommendations if they are part of developing the plan of care
Critical-thinking process
1. Evaluation
2. Planning
Accurate recording is important for evaluation, insurance reimbursement, and research
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is more than the use of best-practice techniques to treat patients
Evidence-based practice
The integration of research evidence, clinical expertise, clinical knowledge (physical assessment), and patient values and preferences
Clinical decision making depends on all four factors: the best evidence from a critical review of research literature; the patient's own preferences; the clinician's own experience and expertise; and finally physical examination and assessment
Assessment skills must be practiced with hands-on experience and refined to a high level
It is important to question tradition when no compelling research evidence exists to support it
Some time-honored assessment techniques have been removed from the examination repertoire because clinical evidence indicates that these techniques are not as accurate as once believed
Steps to evidence-based practice
1. Ask an evidence-based question
2. Gather best research evidence through a literature search
3. Appraise the evidence to identify better treatment or assessment approach
4. Institute a new practice protocol and monitor patient outcomes
Research led to a change of clinical practice that was safe, effective, and efficient
Evidence shows that other assessment skills are effective for patient care, such as measuring the ankle brachial index (ABI)
It often takes up to 17 years for research findings to be implemented into practice
Barriers to evidence-based practice
Nurses lack research skills in evaluating quality of research studies
Nurses are isolated from other colleagues knowledgeable in research
Nurses lack confidence to implement change
Lack of time for nurses to go to the library to read research
Inadequate library research holdings
Lack of organizational support for EBP when nurses wish to implement changes in patient care
Fostering a culture of EBP at the undergraduate and graduate levels is one way in which health care educators attempt to make evidence-based care the gold standard of practice
Facilitating support for EBP at the organizational level includes time to go to the library; teaching staff to conduct electronic searches; journal club meetings; establishing nursing research committees; linking staff with university researchers; and ensuring that adequate research journals and preprocessed evidence resources are available in the library
Four types of patient data
Complete (Total Health) Database
Focused or Problem-Centered Database
Follow-Up Database
Emergency Database
Complete (Total Health) Database
Includes a complete health history and a full physical examination, describes the current and past health state and forms a baseline against which all future changes can be measured, yields the first diagnoses
Focused or Problem-Centered Database
For a limited or short-term problem, collects a "mini" database, smaller in scope and more targeted than the complete database, concerns mainly one problem, one cue complex, or one body system