In his early twenties, not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive
Symbolic of redemption
Priestley presents Eric in a sympathetic light through Eric's opposition to Mr Birling's capitalist and individualistic attitudes
The audience's feeling of sympathy for Eric is increased by the evident lack of a good role model as a father
Priestley portrays society's norms as the reason for the immoral behaviour of Eric (his rape of Eva) - he is simply following in the footsteps of other men
Eric is presented as naive and ignorant of the true extent of the suffering of the lower-class
Remorse and regret is clearly shown by Eric while he accepts responsibility for his actions, yet he rejects taking sole responsibility for her suicide
The character of Eric can be seen as a source of optimism; anyone can change for the better
Involuntarily
Eric's emotional response to the news of Eva's death shows that he has morals, as he could not suppress his emotional reaction
Eric's reaction to her death
Contrasted with Mr Birling's dismissive reaction
Eric's socialist views
He condemns his father's capitalist view of his workers and challenges this through the question "why shouldn't they try for higher wages?"
Priestley presents Eric, with the capacity for empathy and emotion, which therefore separates him (and Sheila) from the other characters, who are unable to experience such emotions
Eric initially sees Mr Birling's hypocrisy in the determination to achieve "lower costs and higher prices", yet, denying Eva and his employees a higher wage
Eric realises that there is no meritocracy and that a "good worker" does not constitute better treatment, but that capitalism exists fundamentally to exploit workers and create profit
Eric recognises how his father is hypocritical in hiding his views from Inspector as he "[Laughs bitterly] I didn't notice you told him that it's every man for himself"
Priestley demonstrates Eric's discomfort towards his family's lifestyle and privilege, through the stage directions "not quite at ease"
Eric interrupts his father's engagement speech and protests "[not too rudely] Well don't do any (speechmaking). We'll drink to their health and have done with it."
Eric acknowledges that Mr Birling's "respectable friends", such as "alderman Meggerty" are acting immorally, but Eric is too weak to stand up for his own beliefs
Alcohol is Eric's response and coping mechanism to the hypocrisy and materialism of his family
Priestley teaches that people need to stand up for reform regardless of who they are in society, otherwise they may end up accepting what's wrong like Eric did
Eric has been raised by a "cold woman" and a father who is "not the kind of father a chap could go to when he's in trouble", which has condemned him to treating others with the same callousness
Priestley uses Mr Birling's capitalist, individualistic and patriarchal lectures to show the audience that Eric is being shaped by the values of his father
Priestley provides a legitimate explanation for Eric's immoral actions, as "respectable" men use prostitutes therefore Eric has learnt to associate prostitution with the normal behaviour of the upper-class
Eric's narration of what happened with Eva is likely to be unreliable, as he says "and that's when it happened", using the pronoun "it" to allow the audience to fill in the gaps
Priestley uses the euphemistic phrase "that state when a chap easily turns nasty" as a substitute for Eric's admittance of being drunk
Utility
The value of something measured through the usefulness of their bodies and sexual appeal
Unreliable narration
Eric is left to tell the story about what he did to Eva, meaning his narration is likely to be biased and not fully truthful
Eric says "and that's when it happened"
The use of the pronoun "it" allows the audience to fill in the gaps about what Eric did to Eva
Priestley's intention is for Eric to be favoured by the audience and serve as a medium for socialist ideas and converted capitalists
Euphemistic phrase
"that state when a chap easily turns nasty" is a substitute for Eric's admittance of being drunk
Priestley's choice of colloquial language normalises Eric's lack of restraint and implies the alcohol caused him to act that way, not his lack of morals
Throughout the play the audience is encouraged to consider whether Eric's actions are really reflective of his true character, or whether society has conditioned him to behave that way
Genuine regret
Eric is portrayed by Priestley as repentant and remorseful for his immoral actions towards Eva
Eric recalls his actions as "yes I remember -"
Priestley does this to demonstrate Eric's authentic regret
Priestley's linguistic use of euphemistic phrases and dramatic exit
Shows that Eric feels guilty and doesn't want to think about what he did, as he's ashamed of his actions
Eric uses the third-person when recalling events
Allows him to disassociate himself from his cruel actions
Limited responsibility
Priestley portrays Eric as only partially accepting responsibility for the death of Eva Smith
Eric excuses his behaviour by comparing his exploitation of Eva to the use of prostitutes by Mr Birling's "respectable friends"
Implies he is not responsible for how he acted, due to a lack of good role models
Colloquial noun "chap"
Suggests Eric is trivialising the situation and doesn't feel guilty to a great extent
Eric's attempts to divert blame away from himself - be it the influence of immoral men or his own intoxication - causes him to be perceived as similar to the older generation as he is avoiding responsibility
Eric consistently challenges and opposes Mr Birling's opinions and capitalist attitudes
Priestley places these characters in juxtaposition to mirror the conflict between capitalism and socialism