the USA uses 'electoral districts and states' through rewarding electoral boundaries for political advantage, certain groups may be targeted and denied effective representation
we use the theory to look at the impact of electoral systems on political outcomes
we can use the theory to examine how the electoral systems affect the role and influence of political parties
the theory can allow us to investigate how electoral systems affect how much different groups in society are represented
the USA employs a 'winner takes all' system where the candidate with the most votes wins the elections, regardless of whether they have a majority and leads to most states being dominated by a specific party
UK GEs use FPTP which increase the likelihood of a two party system and can lead to disparities between the seats a party has and its share of the vote
we can use the theory to look at how electoral systems shape voter beaviour
In the USA the two party system means that third party candidates can have an impact on electoral outcomes through the 'spoiler effect'
FPTP tends to encourage voters to use tactical voting rather than vote for the party candidates they most support because of wasted votes and the existence of safe seats
in the UK, the theory can examine how FPTP system incentivises parties to build broad coalitions of voters and focus on marginal seats
this incentivises candidates to focus on specific states called swing states or battleground states, where the outcomes of the election are less certain
in the UK where FPTP is used in GEs, there tends to be a concentration of power around two larger parties. this means that smaller that represent minority groups struggle to win seats and have their voices represented