The plan for testing a hypothesis, the experiment's structure or floor plan, not the specific content
We can use the same design to investigate different hypotheses
Factors that determine an experimental design
The number of independent variables in the hypothesis
The number of treatment conditions needed to fairly test
Whether the same subjects are used in each of the treatment conditions
Between-subjects design
A subject participates in only one condition of the experiment
Generalizability
The representatives of our sample determine whether we can generalize our results to the entire population from which the sample was drawn
Random sampling
Increases an experiment's external validity
Minimum number of subjects per group
10 to 20 subjects in each treatment condition to detect a strong treatment effect
Effect size
A statistical estimate of the size or magnitude of a treatment effect, the larger the effect size the stronger the relationship between the independent and dependent variables and the fewer subjects needed to detect a treatment effect
Effect size
Determines the number of subjects required to detect a treatment effect
Two-group design
Involves the creation of two separate groups of subjects
Two-independent groups design
One IV with two levels and subjects are randomly assigned to one of the two conditions
Random assignment
Assigning subjects to conditions so that each subject has an equal chance of participating in each condition, to equally distribute subject variables between the treatment groups to prevent them from confounding an experiment
Experimental condition
Presents a value of the independent variable
Control condition
Presents a zero level of the independent variable
Two experimental groups design
Assign subjects to one of the two levels of the independent variable
Random assignment works poorly with 5 to 10 subjects per condition, and may not control all extraneous variables
Two matched group design
Match participants on a subject variable correlated with the DV, and randomly assign them to one of two treatment conditions
Matching
Used to create groups that are equivalent on potentially confounding subject variables, to prevent selection threat from undermining internal validity
Precision matching
Form pairs of identical IQ scores, randomly assign members of each pair to one of two treatment conditions
Range matching
Form pairs of scores that fall within a specified range, randomly assign members of each pair to one of two treatment conditions
Rank ordered matching
Rank all IQ scores from highest to lowest, form pairs of scores that fall in adjacent tracks, randomly assign members of each pair to one of two treatment groups
Two matched group designs should be used when there are two levels of an independent variable and there is an extraneous variable we can measure that could affect the dependent variable
Multiple groups design
A between subjects design with more than two levels of an independent variable
Multiple independent groups design
Randomly assign subjects to one of the treatment conditions
Block randomization
A process for randomly assigning equal numbers of subjects to conditions, the experimenter creates random sequences of each experimental condition and subjects are randomly assigned to fill each treatment block
The hypothesis, prior research, pilot study results, and practical limits can all help determine the number of treatments
Pilot study
A trial run of the experiment that uses a few subjects, can help the experimenter refine the procedure or determine whether the experiment is promising