Everyone has the right to freedom of speech this includes the right to hold opinions, recieve information and impart information and ideas without interference from public authority
what are the keyprovisions of article 10
freedom to hold opinions
freedom to receive information and ideas
freedom to impart information and ideas
Freedom to hold opinions
There is no restrictions to what an opinion a person can hold
no one should be forced to communicate an opinion
is article 10 a positive or negative duty
Negative duty as it is imposing a negative duty on state preventing them from doing something
freedom to impart information and ideas
this includes the right to “shock,offend and disturb”
Handyside v uk case- there was no breach of Article 10
Handyside v uk
no breach of Article 10 it fell within the margin of appreciation
what types of expressions are protected under article 10
political
artistic
commercial
political expression
have less margin of appreciation as it is “high value”
artisticexpression
O v Austria
commercial expression
Steel morris v uk- public intrest
Freedomofpress
freedom of press ensuresfree expression and possibility to debate
Goodwin v Uk , axel springer v germany
Goodwin v Uk
Breach of Article 10 as the injunction was already done which prohibited the injunction
Axel springer v germany criteria for balancing Article 8 and Article 10
was the information of general interest
the noterity or the perso involved and the subject matter
prior conduct of the person involved
method of obtaining the information
conduct, form and consequences of publication
severity of sanction imposed
Freedom to receive information and ideas
includes the freedom to gather and seek out information through all lawful sources
includes the freedom to enable the media to communicate information to the public and the public have the right to be adequately informed
Guerra v italy
Guerra v italy
Positive duty to make information know
what does the investigatory powers act 2016 give
give everyone. in the uk the right to access recorded information held by public sector organisation
Justifications of article 10 (2)
prescribed by law
necesssary in a democratic society
intrests of the national security
Article 10 (2)- for the prevention of crime and disorder
it must be proportionate
Surek v turkey
(2) protection of the reputation or rights of others
Article 8 and 10 must be balanced
Bedat v switzerland
(2) preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence
if you revive information through unlawful means it cannot be expressed