Refers to the features which belong to individuals with genetic throwbacks
Lombroso's theory of offending behavior
Noticed that criminals share physical characteristics like bloodshot eyes, low brows, hawk like nose
Claimed that criminals are 'born, not made'
Concluded that people with the features were wild and untameable which would inevitably at some point turn them to crime
Physical characteristics of criminals
Murder has bloodshot eyes with a cold stare and a large nose
Thief has an expressive face and small wandering eyes
Sex offenders have thick lips
Female criminals are short often have dark hair
Many will be tattooed and will speak with a slang
Goring's research
Disagreed that criminality is innate, using a sample of criminals and non-criminals
Strengths of Lombroso's theory
One of the first medical professionals to realise that criminals could be studied scientifically
Facial features presenting aggression can lead others in society to assume that they are actually aggressive forcing them to confront which could lead to becoming criminally violent
Weaknesses of Lombroso's theory
Theory had no real methodology and was biased; sampling bias, confirmation bias and had ethical concerns
Criminals encountered by Lombroso was poor and uneducated with many health issues, lacks validity
Biological deterministic
Suggests that criminals should not be blamed as it is genetically inherited
Lombroso's theory is reductionist, trying to explain a complex phenomenon by using only one explanation
Genetic explanations
Idea that there may be a specific gene which predisposes individuals to turn to crime
Mutations within specific genes or combos of genes may be a contributory factor
Chromosomal variations been linked to increase in testosterone which increased aggression
If criminality is based on genes, then there will be 100% concordance rate between MZ twins
Candidate genes such as the MAOA gene may predispose an individual criminal behaviour
Neural explanations
Assumes that specific neurotransmitters and brain structure may increase criminal behaviour
If levels of seretonin are unstable than this may lead to increased impulsivity and mood swings
Small amyglada may be linked to a lack of empathy in offenders → explains lack of guilt and remorse
Impulsive murders do not use the prefrontal cortex to perform simple cognitive tasks ? prefrontal corext is though to regulate impulsive behaviours
Strengths of biological explanations
Good supporting evidence for genetic explanations of offending behavior → twin study used a sample of 35,000 twins and found concordance higher in MZ twins
Uses of brain imaging techniques such as PET scans provides objective clinical evidence giving it good reliability
Weaknesses of biological explanations
No single specific gene, or combo of genes have been identified
Brain imaging techniques can be unreliable if they are not done properly - sensitive to temp and noise
Biological explanations of offending behavior
Relates to the nature side of the nature-nurture debate
Genetic explanations
Idea that there may be a specific gene which predisposes individuals to turn to crime
Mutations within specific genes or combos of genes may be a contributory factor
Chromosomal variations been linked to increase in testosterone which increased aggression
If criminality is based on genes, then there will be 100% concordance rate between MZ twins
Candidate genes such as the MAOA gene may predispose an individual criminal behaviour
Neural explanations
Assumes that specific neurotransmitters and brain structure may increase criminal behaviour
If levels of seretonin are unstable than this may lead to increased impulsivity and mood swings
Small amyglada may be linked to a lack of empathy in offenders → explains lack of guilt and remorse
Impulsive murders do not use the prefrontal cortex to perform simple cognitive tasks - prefrontal corcortexext is though to regulate impulsive behavioursthought
Strengths of biological explanations
Good supporting evidence for genetic explanations of offending behavior → twin study used a sample of 35,000 twins and found concordance higher in MZ twins
Uses of brain imaging techniques such as PET scans provides objective clinical evidence giving it good reliability
Weaknesses of biological explanations
No single specific gene, or combo of genes have been identified
Brain imaging techniques can be unreliable if they are not done properly - sensitive to temp and noise
Biological explanations of offending behavior
Links to the nature side of the nature-nurture debate