POLIT & BECK, 2004 - It follows a step-by-step process of investigation that uses a standardized approach.
L1 | 1.0. DEFINITION & DESCRIPTION
PALISPIS, 2004 - It plays an important role in tertiary education. Though there are many problems confronted by higher education, development are realized through research.
L1 | 1.0. DEFINITION & DESCRIPTION
SANCHEZ, 1999 - It is an investigation following orderedsteps leading to a discovery of new information or concepts.
L1 | 1.0. DEFINITION & DESCRIPTION
BASSEY, AS CITED BY COLEMAN & BRIGGS, 2002 - It is a very careful investigation of something that supports the contributions of additional or new knowledge.
L1 | 1.0. DEFINITION & DESCRIPTION
CRAWFORD, AS CITED BY ALCANTARA & ESPINA, 1995 - It tests approach of thinking and employing validated instruments and steps.
L1 | 1.2. CHARACTERISTICS OF A RESEARCH
It should be systematic
It should be feasible
It should be empirical
It should be clear
L1 | 1.3. GENERAL FORMS OF RESEARCH
Scientific - Naturally occurring phenomena are examine. It is a systematic process that involves formulating hypothesis, testing predictions using relevant data.
L1 | 1.3. GENERAL FORMS OF RESEARCH
Research in the Humanities - Seeks to define the purpose of humanexistence.
L1 | 1.3. GENERAL FORMS OF RESEARCH
Artistic - Provides alternative approaches to establish concepts by conducting practical methods as substitutes for fundamental and theoretical ones.
L1 | 2.2. TYPES OF QUALITATIVE STUDY
Phenomenological study - Livedexperience
L1 | 2.2. TYPES OF QUALITATIVE STUDY
Ethnographic study - Cultural groups or minorities.
L1 | 2.2. TYPES OF QUALITATIVE STUDY
Case study - In depth examination of an individual, groups of people, or an institution.
L1 | 2.2. TYPES OF QUALITATIVE STUDY
Grounded theory - Comparing collected units of data against one another.
L1 | 2.2. TYPES OF QUALITATIVE STUDY
Basic interpretative qualitative study - How individuals give meanings (Perception-based)
L1 | 2.3. QUALITATIVE PROS & CONS
STRENGTH
Useful to conduct limited in-depth case studies or interviews.
Useful for describingcomplexphenomena.
Useful for a specific environment, context and condition
Include researcher and people'spersonalexperience of phenomena
Research is more dynamic and flexible
Research findings in words and narrative could explain the phenomena better and more in-depth.
L1 | 2.3. QUALITATIVE PROS & CONS
WEAKNESS
Research findings mightnotbegeneral and it applies to specific context.
Insufficientresearchdata to text hypotheses and build theory.
Data collection and analyze could be timeconsuming.
Data collection and analysis could be resourceintensive.
Research resultsareeasilyinfluenced by the researcher's personalbiases.
L1 | 3.0. QUANTITATIVE STUDY
A systematic investigation of observablephenomena where the researcher gathers quantitative or numerical data and subjects them to statistical methods.
L1 | 2.0. QUALITATIVE STUDY
Defined as the naturalistic method of inquiry of research which deals with the issue of humancomplexity by exploring it directly (Polit and Beck, 2008)
L1 | 3.2. TYPES OF QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Descriptive - Report and observe certain phenomenon.
L1 | 3.2. TYPES OF QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Correlational - It shows relationship of the variables.
L1 | 3.2. TYPES OF QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Ex-post Facto - It shows causes to effect.
L1 | 3.2. TYPES OF QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Quasi Experimental - Cause and effect that go with intact groups.
L1 | 3.2. TYPES OF QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Experimental - Cause and effect that proceed to extensive variable manipulation.
L1 | 3.3 QUANTITATIVE PROS & CONS
STRENGTH
Easy to implement the research (surveys & questionnaires)
Relatively quick to gather research data.
Provides precise and numerical research data.
Useful for large sampling size.
Relatively faster to analyze research data (SPSS )
Easier to interpret research data.
L1 | 3.3 QUANTITATIVE PROS & CONS
WEAKNESSES
Researcher's theory and hypothesis might not reflect real phenomena.
Research data gathered could be too general research results mightnot in-depth.
Research results could be bias as researcher is verifying his/her pre-determined theory and hypotheses instead of building them from the research findings.
3.3. QUANTITATIVE PROS & CONS
SPSS - Statistical Package for the SocialScience - one of the most-used statistical analysis tools/software program in research, particularly in the social sciences.